% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Schtz:844498,
      author       = {Schütz, Holger and Wiedemann, Peter M.},
      title        = {{I}mplementation of the {S}eveso directive in {G}ermany —
                      {A}n evaluation of hazardous incident information},
      journal      = {Safety science},
      volume       = {18},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {0925-7535},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-01908},
      pages        = {203 - 214},
      year         = {1995},
      abstract     = {According to the recently implemented German Hazardous
                      Incident Ordinance (Störfallverordnung), chemical companies
                      to which that ordinance applies are obliged to inform the
                      public about risks of a plant and appropriate emergency
                      behaviour by providing hazardous incident information. For
                      an evaluation study a prototype hazardous incident
                      information (HII) package was designed and evaluated in a
                      telephone survey by using a standardized questionnaire. The
                      questionnaire covered reception and assessment (e.g.,
                      comprehensibility, credibility) of the HII, risk perception,
                      trust, and knowledge about hazardous incident warnings and
                      emergency behaviour. One week after having distributed the
                      HII among the residents of the pharmaceutical plant, 204
                      residents who had been provided with the HII answered the
                      questionnaire in a telephone interview. Four weeks later 154
                      of these residents again answered the questionnaire. At that
                      time, a control group of 101 residents who did not receive
                      the HII also answered the questionnaire. The results show
                      that, in general, subjects rated the HII positively.
                      Informed subjects had significantly more knowledge about
                      hazardous incident warnings and emergency behaviour. The HII
                      did not influence risk perception but led to a significant
                      increase in trust in the company. Finally, no time effects
                      were found with regard to hazardous incident knowledge.},
      cin          = {INM-8},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406},
      pnm          = {899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:A1995QN62300004},
      doi          = {10.1016/0925-7535(94)00045-5},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844498},
}