% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Siebers:844597,
author = {Siebers, Nina and Abdelrahman, Hamada and Krause, Lars and
Amelung, Wulf},
title = {{B}ias in aggregate geometry and properties after
disintegration and drying procedures},
journal = {Geoderma},
volume = {313},
issn = {0016-7061},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-02001},
pages = {163 - 171},
year = {2018},
abstract = {Isolation and drying soil microaggregates and their
building units are of crucial importance when studying their
structure and function within different soil management
systems. Our aim was to evaluate how different drying
techniques preserve small aggregate building units after
different disintegration steps. After applying fast wetting,
slaking, or ultrasonic dispersion at 440 J mL− 1 to
Cambisol topsoils under either long-term forest, grassland,
or arable soil management, aggregate-size distributions were
assessed using fast image analyses after optical
particle-size assessment prior and after air- and
freeze-drying. Microaggregates isolated by dry-sieving
served as control. While ultrasonic dispersion significantly
disintegrated soil aggregates into smaller units, slaking in
water did not. Intriguingly, freeze-drying preserved the
aggregate size distribution fairly well, with a
reaggregation ranging between 1.2 and $10.1\%.$ In contrast,
air-drying led to substantial reaggregation of particles
ranging between 20.4 and $44.9\%.$ However, freeze-drying
also led to slight deformation of particles and also to a
redistribution of elements between size-fractions, the
extent of which being different for the samples under
different land-use. We conclude that ultrasonic treatment
followed by freeze-drying is suitable to preserve the
correct aggregate size of at least Cambisols, but the
properties of the secondary particles may still not reflect
true geometric forms and chemical properties.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000424179800016},
doi = {10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.028},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844597},
}