% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Dafsari:844794,
author = {Dafsari, Haidar Salimi and Petry-Schmelzer, Jan Niklas and
Ray-Chaudhuri, K. and Ashkan, Keyoumars and Weis, Luca and
Dembek, Till A. and Samuel, Michael and Rizos, Alexandra and
Silverdale, Monty and Barbe, Michael T. and Fink, Gereon R.
and Evans, Julian and Martinez-Martin, Pablo and Antonini,
Angelo and Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle and Timmermann, Lars},
title = {{N}on-motor outcomes of subthalamic stimulation in
{P}arkinson's disease depend on location of active contacts},
journal = {Brain stimulation},
volume = {11},
number = {4},
issn = {1876-4754},
address = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-02170},
pages = {904-912},
year = {2018},
abstract = {BackgroundSubthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation
(DBS) improves quality of life (QoL), motor, and non-motor
symptoms (NMS) in Parkinson's disease (PD). Few studies have
investigated the influence of the location of
neurostimulation on NMS.ObjectiveTo investigate the impact
of active contact location on NMS in STN-DBS in PD.MethodsIn
this prospective, open-label, multicenter study including 50
PD patients undergoing bilateral STN-DBS, we collected
NMSScale (NMSS), NMSQuestionnaire (NMSQ), Hospital Anxiety
and Depression Scale (anxiety/depression, HADS-A/-D),
PDQuestionnaire-8 (PDQ-8), Scales for Outcomes in PD-motor
examination, motor complications, activities of daily living
(ADL), and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD)
preoperatively and at 6 months follow-up. Changes were
analyzed with Wilcoxon signed-rank/t-test and
Bonferroni-correction for multiple comparisons. Although the
STN was targeted visually, we employed an atlas-based
approach to explore the relationship between active contact
locations and DBS outcomes. Based on fused MRI/CT-images, we
identified Cartesian coordinates of active contacts with
patient-specific Mai-atlas standardization. We computed
linear mixed-effects models with x-/y-/z-coordinates as
independent, hemispheres as within-subject, and test change
scores as dependent variables.ResultsNMSS, NMSQ, PDQ-8,
motor examination, complications, and LEDD significantly
improved at follow-up. Linear mixed-effect models showed
that NMS and QoL improvement significantly depended on more
medial (HADS-D, NMSS), anterior (HADS-D, NMSQ, PDQ-8), and
ventral (HADS-A/-D, NMSS, PDQ-8) neurostimulation. ADL
improved more in posterior, LEDD in lateral neurostimulation
locations. No relationship was observed for motor
examination and complications scores.ConclusionsOur study
provides evidence that more anterior, medial, and ventral
STN-DBS is significantly related to more beneficial
non-motor outcomes.},
cin = {INM-3},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
pnm = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:29655586},
UT = {WOS:000436849700030},
doi = {10.1016/j.brs.2018.03.009},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844794},
}