% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Wulf:845249,
      author       = {Wulf, Christina and Werker, Jasmin and Zapp, Petra and
                      Schreiber, Andrea and Schlör, Holger and Kuckshinrichs,
                      Wilhelm},
      title        = {{S}ustainable {D}evelopment {G}oals as a {G}uideline for
                      {I}ndicator {S}election in {L}ife {C}ycle {S}ustainability
                      {A}ssessment},
      journal      = {Procedia CIRP},
      volume       = {69},
      issn         = {2212-8271},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-02532},
      pages        = {59 - 65},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) emerged as a
                      methodology allowing a detailed representation of
                      technologies in their processes from a life cycle
                      perspective. To conduct a profound LCSA a plausible
                      indicator selection is needed. From a Sustainability
                      perspective, the currently dominant political framework is
                      the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United
                      Nations. In this paper, LCSA indicators are selected based
                      on the SDGs, comparing in a first approach the implication
                      due to the selection based on overall goals and SDG
                      indicators level. The applicability of this selection is
                      tested by a case study of electrolytic hydrogen production.
                      The analysis shows meaningful differences between the
                      goal-based and the indicator-based assessment. Only the
                      goal-based indicator set comprises all dimensions of
                      sustainability.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000435141900011},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.144},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845249},
}