% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Rennhack:845551,
author = {Rennhack, Andreas and Schiffer, Christian and Brenker,
Christoph and Fridman, Dmitry and Nitao, Elis T and Cheng,
Yi-Min and Tamburrino, Lara and Balbach, Melanie and
Stölting, Gabriel and Berger, Thomas K and Kierzek,
Michelina and Alvarez, Luis and Wachten, Dagmar and Zeng,
Xu-Hui and Baldi, Elisabetta and Publicover, Stephen and
Kaupp, Ulrich Benjamin and Strünker, Timo},
title = {{A} novel cross-species inhibitor to study the function of
{C}at{S}per {C}a 2 + channels in sperm},
journal = {British journal of pharmacology},
volume = {175},
number = {15},
issn = {0007-1188},
address = {Malden, MA},
publisher = {Wiley},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-02777},
pages = {3144-3161},
year = {2018},
abstract = {Background and PurposeSperm from many species share the
sperm‐specific Ca2+ channel CatSper that controls the
intracellular Ca2+ concentration and, thereby, the swimming
behaviour. A growing body of evidence suggests that the
mechanisms controlling the activity of CatSper and its role
during fertilization differ among species. A lack of
suitable pharmacological tools has hampered the elucidation
of the function of CatSper. Known inhibitors of CatSper
exhibit considerable side effects and also inhibit Slo3, the
principal K+ channel of mammalian sperm. The compound RU1968
was reported to suppress Ca2+ signaling in human sperm by an
unknown mechanism. Here, we examined the action of RU1968 on
CatSper in sperm from humans, mice, and sea
urchins.Experimental ApproachWe resynthesized RU1968 and
studied its action on sperm from humans, mice, and the sea
urchin Arbacia punctulata by Ca2+ fluorimetry, single‐cell
Ca2+ imaging, electrophysiology, opto‐chemistry, and
motility analysis.Key ResultsRU1968 inhibited CatSper in
sperm from invertebrates and mammals. The compound lacked
toxic side effects in human sperm, did not affect mouse
Slo3, and inhibited human Slo3 with about 15‐fold lower
potency than CatSper. Moreover, in human sperm, RU1968
mimicked CatSper dysfunction and suppressed motility
responses evoked by progesterone, an oviductal steroid known
to activate CatSper. Finally, RU1968 abolished
CatSper‐mediated chemotactic navigation in sea urchin
sperm.Conclusion and ImplicationsWe propose RU1968 as a
novel tool to elucidate the function of CatSper channels in
sperm across species.},
cin = {ICS-4},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)ICS-4-20110106},
pnm = {551 - Functional Macromolecules and Complexes (POF3-551) /
IHRS-BioSoft - International Helmholtz Research School of
Biophysics and Soft Matter (IHRS-BioSoft-20061101)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-551 / G:(DE-Juel1)IHRS-BioSoft-20061101},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:29723408},
UT = {WOS:000437671300007},
doi = {10.1111/bph.14355},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845551},
}