000845673 001__ 845673
000845673 005__ 20220930130148.0
000845673 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/fnhum.2018.00197
000845673 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/18490
000845673 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000431989100001
000845673 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:39310121
000845673 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:29867420
000845673 037__ $$aFZJ-2018-02885
000845673 082__ $$a610
000845673 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)136988$$aGeiger, Alexander$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000845673 245__ $$aSocial Cues Alter Implicit Motor Learning in a Serial Reaction Time Task
000845673 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Research Foundation$$c2018
000845673 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000845673 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000845673 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1526288877_6520
000845673 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000845673 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000845673 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000845673 520__ $$aLearning is a central ability for human development. Many skills we learn, such as language, are learned through observation or imitation in social contexts. Likewise, many skills are learned implicitly, that is, without an explicit intent to learn and without full awareness of the acquired knowledge. Here, we asked whether performance in a motor learning task is modulated by social vs. object cues of varying validity. To address this question, we asked participants to carry out a serial reaction time (SRT) task in which, on each trial, people have to respond as fast and as accurately as possible to the appearance of a stimulus at one of four possible locations. Unbeknownst to participants, the sequence of successive locations was sequentially structured, so that knowledge of the sequence facilitates anticipation of the next stimulus and hence faster motor responses. Crucially, each trial also contained a cue pointing to the next stimulus location. Participants could thus learn based on the cue, or on learning about the sequence of successive locations, or on a combination of both. Results show an interaction between cue type and cue validity for the motor responses: social cues (vs. object cues) led to faster responses in the low validity (LV) condition only. Concerning the extent to which learning was implicit, results show that in the cued blocks only, the highly valid social cue led to implicit learning. In the uncued blocks, participants showed no implicit learning in the highly valid social cue condition, but did in all other combinations of stimulus type and cueing validity. In conclusion, our results suggest that implicit learning is context-dependent and can be influenced by the cue type, e.g., social and object cues.
000845673 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$a572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)$$cPOF3-572$$fPOF III$$x0
000845673 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000845673 7001_ $$aCleeremans, Axel$$b1
000845673 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBente, Gary$$b2
000845673 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145756$$aVogeley, Kai$$b3
000845673 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2425477-0$$a10.3389/fnhum.2018.00197$$gVol. 12, p. 197$$p197$$tFrontiers in human neuroscience$$v12$$x1662-5161$$y2018
000845673 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845673/files/fnhum-12-00197.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000845673 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845673/files/fnhum-12-00197.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
000845673 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845673/files/fnhum-12-00197.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yOpenAccess
000845673 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845673/files/fnhum-12-00197.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000845673 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845673/files/fnhum-12-00197.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
000845673 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845673/files/fnhum-12-00197.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000845673 8767_ $$82017-0109795-2$$92018-05-11$$d2018-05-14$$eAPC$$jDeposit$$lDeposit: Frontiers
000845673 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:845673$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire$$pdnbdelivery
000845673 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)136988$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000845673 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x0
000845673 9141_ $$y2018
000845673 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000845673 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000845673 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000845673 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bFRONT HUM NEUROSCI : 2015
000845673 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000845673 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000845673 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000845673 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000845673 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000845673 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000845673 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000845673 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000845673 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000845673 920__ $$lyes
000845673 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000845673 980__ $$ajournal
000845673 980__ $$aVDB
000845673 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000845673 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000845673 980__ $$aAPC
000845673 9801_ $$aAPC
000845673 9801_ $$aFullTexts