% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wilson:845734,
author = {Wilson, Grant and Barbour, Edward and Ketelaer, Thomas and
Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm},
title = {{A}n analysis of storage revenues from time-shifting of
electrical energy in {G}ermany and {G}reat {B}ritain from
2010 to 2016},
journal = {Journal of energy storage},
volume = {17},
issn = {2352-152X},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-02946},
pages = {446-456},
year = {2018},
abstract = {The purpose of this paper is to investigate the level of
revenues available to storage operators through the bulk
time-shifting of electrical energy in Germany and Great
Britain over the 7 years from 2010 to 2016, and to analyse
the impact of volatility and underlying mean price on the
potential revenues that a storage operator could
theoretically capture. The analysis is carried out using an
algorithm adapted from previous work, coupled with new
empirical hourly price data from the German and Great
British day-ahead electrical markets, and using
characteristics typical of a pumped-storage hydropower
scheme (1000 MWh, 125 MW charge and discharge, and
$75\%$ round-trip efficiency). Our results suggest that
volatility rather than average price is the dominant factor
affecting storage revenues, with a $1\%$ increase in
volatility implying an increase in mean daily storage
revenues of €300 in Germany and £550 in Great Britain for
the simulated storage plant. In comparison, an increase in
underlying mean prices of €1 per MWh leads to an increase
in mean daily revenue of €100 in Germany, with a £1 per
MWh increase in underlying mean prices leading to an
increase in mean daily revenue of £380 in Great Britain. We
also find that during the period 2010–2016, the times when
the highest revenue is derived have moved from late morning
to early evening, which we attribute to the increase in low
short-run marginal cost solar PV electricity in both markets
suppressing the day-ahead wholesale electrical prices. In
addition, we find a large increase in storage operator
revenues in Britain in the last quarter of 2016, due to a
number of events that impacted the price of electricity,
however these would have been difficult to predict with any
degree of certainty. This paper therefore highlights the
perennial problem of forecasting the time-shifting revenue
for electrical energy, with its high degree of variation
from one year to the next that would undoubtedly impact the
financing of these capital-intensive projects that seek to
capture these variable revenues.},
cin = {IEK-STE},
ddc = {333.7},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
pnm = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000432692900042},
doi = {10.1016/j.est.2018.04.005},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845734},
}