001     845994
005     20210129233757.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.093
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0306-2619
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1872-9118
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/24144
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000445987200050
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2018-03166
082 _ _ |a 620
100 1 _ |a Lahnaoui, Amin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)169372
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Techno-economic analysis of photovoltaic battery system configuration and location
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2018
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1580721999_823
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The techno-economic analysis investigates first the impact of tilt angle and orientation on the production profile of a rooftop solar generator and the related performance of a photovoltaic battery storage system for single family houses at a specific location in Germany. Then, a technical comparison to a different location in Almeria in Spain is performed.The calculations are model-based and take into consideration the consumer load profile, technical and economic photovoltaic battery storage system parameters as well as the framework of regulations for the case of Germany. The parameters “share of self-consumption”, “degree of autarky”, and “economic efficiency in terms of levelized cost of electricity” make up the focus of the modelling results. It is concluded that self-consumption and degree of autarky are strongly and inversely related. In terms of system design, a trade-off has to be made between aiming for high self-consumption and a high degree of autarky.Key findings from the modelling results reveal that in Lindenberg in Germany, a south orientation gives the highest degree of autarky and the lowest levelized cost of electricity, but with the lowest share of self-consumption as well. For rooftops oriented towards east/west, an interesting possibility could be to split the total installed capacity (equally) between the two orientations. This makes it possible to benefit from the high self-consumption of the east orientation and the high degree of autarky of the west orientation. In general, it has to be considered that the optimum orientation strongly depends on the consumer load profile. The technical analysis shows that changing the location to Almeria increases degree of autarky and decreases share of self-consumption for south orientation with different magnitude that depends on the load profile. Finally, the results show opposite impacts that depend on orientation and location when switching from a tilt angle of 30° to 45°. For a south orientation in Almeria and Lindenberg, the degree of autarky is increased when approaching the optimum tilt angle, while for west and east orientations in Lindenberg self-consumption increases.
536 _ _ |a 153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|c POF3-153
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Stenzel, Peter
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145405
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Linssen, Jochen
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130470
|b 2
770 _ _ |a Transformative Innovations for a Sustainable Future – Part III
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.093
|g p. S0306261917313752
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2000772-3
|p 497-505
|t Applied energy
|v 227
|y 2018
|x 0306-2619
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845994/files/1-s2.0-S0306261917313752-main.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845994/files/1-s2.0-S0306261917313752-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845994/files/Postprint_AE_2017.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/845994/files/Postprint_AE_2017.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:845994
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)169372
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145405
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130470
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Technologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b APPL ENERG : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b APPL ENERG : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
|k IEK-STE
|l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21