% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Xiao:846010,
      author       = {Xiao, Yao and Chraibi, Mohcine and Qu, Yunchao and Tordeux,
                      Antoine and Gao, Ziyou},
      title        = {{I}nvestigation of {V}oronoi diagram based direction
                      choices using uni- and bi-directional trajectory data},
      journal      = {Physical review / E},
      volume       = {97},
      number       = {5},
      issn         = {2470-0045},
      address      = {Woodbury, NY},
      publisher    = {Inst.},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-03180},
      pages        = {052127},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {In a crowd, individuals make different motion choices such
                      as “moving to destination,” “following another
                      pedestrian,” and “making a detour.” For the sake of
                      convenience, the three direction choices are respectively
                      called destination direction, following direction, and
                      detour direction in this paper. Here, it is found that the
                      featured direction choices could be inspired by the shape
                      characteristics of the Voronoi diagram. To be specific, in
                      the Voronoi cell of a pedestrian, the direction to a Voronoi
                      node is regarded as a potential “detour” direction and
                      the direction perpendicular to a Voronoi link is regarded as
                      a potential “following” direction. A pedestrian
                      generally owns several alternative Voronoi nodes and Voronoi
                      links in a Voronoi cell, and the optimal detour and
                      following direction are determined by considering related
                      factors such as deviation. Plus the destination direction
                      which is directly pointing to the destination, the three
                      basic direction choices are defined in a Voronoi cell. In
                      order to evaluate the Voronoi diagram based basic
                      directions, the empirical trajectory data in both uni- and
                      bi-directional flow experiments are extracted. A time series
                      method considering the step frequency is used to reduce the
                      original trajectories' swaying phenomena which might disturb
                      the recognition of actual forward direction. The deviations
                      between the empirical velocity direction and the basic
                      directions are investigated, and each velocity direction is
                      classified into a basic direction or regarded as an
                      inexplicable direction according to the deviations. The
                      analysis results show that each basic direction could be a
                      potential direction choice for a pedestrian. The combination
                      of the three basic directions could cover most empirical
                      velocity direction choices in both uni- and bi-directional
                      flow experiments.},
      cin          = {IAS-7},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321},
      pnm          = {511 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods
                      (POF3-511)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:29906901},
      UT           = {WOS:000433029300003},
      doi          = {10.1103/PhysRevE.97.052127},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/846010},
}