% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Arndt:847872,
      author       = {Arndt, Thomas and Frick, Claudia},
      title        = {{G}etting {S}cientists {R}eady for {O}pen {A}ccess: {T}he
                      {A}pproaches of {F}orschungszentrum {J}ülich},
      journal      = {Publications},
      volume       = {6},
      number       = {2},
      issn         = {2304-6775},
      address      = {Basel},
      publisher    = {MDPI},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-03203},
      pages        = {24},
      year         = {2018},
      note         = {Case Report},
      abstract     = {Many scientific institutions are faced with the question of
                      how they should inform theirscientists and scientific
                      coordinators about the option of publishing open access.
                      This task is onethat libraries have taken upon themselves:
                      libraries are familiar with the market participants andhave
                      years of experience in teaching information and publication
                      literacy. This case report looks attwo approaches taken by
                      the Central Library of Forschungszentrum Jülich in 2017. It
                      highlights themotivation, strategy, resources and
                      implementation, as well as the first evaluation of both
                      approaches.The first approach was a redesign of the training
                      courses offered by the Central Library with a focus onthe
                      target groups and new contents. The second approach was
                      implemented as part of InternationalOpen Access Week and
                      involved offering an information event tailored to each
                      scientific institute.The event was customized to meet the
                      needs of the target group defined by each institute, the
                      instituteitself, and was organized individually. As a result
                      of these efforts, the open access rate increased overthe
                      last few months and at $48\%$ open access in 2017,
                      Forschungszentrum Jülich is well on its way toachieving the
                      open access goals set by the Helmholtz Association.},
      cin          = {ZB},
      ddc          = {070},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)ZB-20090406},
      pnm          = {899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000436281800012},
      doi          = {10.3390/publications6020024},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/847872},
}