% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@INBOOK{Green:847940,
      author       = {Green, Toby},
      title        = {{F}reemium {O}pen {A}ccess},
      address      = {Berlin},
      publisher    = {De Gruyter Saur},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-03256},
      isbn         = {978-3-11-049406-8},
      series       = {De Gruyter Praxishandbuch},
      pages        = {127-136},
      year         = {2017},
      comment      = {Praxishandbuch Open Access / Söllner, Konstanze ;
                      Mittermaier, Bernhard},
      booktitle     = {Praxishandbuch Open Access / Söllner,
                       Konstanze ; Mittermaier, Bernhard},
      abstract     = {Change to 100 $\%$ Open Access has been slow. Boselli and
                      Galindo-Rueda found thatapproximately 50–55 $\%$ of
                      documents are openly available 3–4 years after
                      publication(Boselli and Galindo-Rueda, 2016) although an
                      industry report estimated that onlyabout a third of all
                      research articles published today are Open Access once
                      embargoperiods are completed (SIMBA 2016). For books, the
                      adoption of Open Access hasbeen snail-like. Searching the
                      Directory of Open Access Books1 shows that just 370new
                      titles were added 2015. Considering that Springer2 alone
                      publishes upwards of4,000 new books annually it is probably
                      fair to say that less than 5 $\%$ of all new scholarlybooks
                      published in 2016 will be freely accessible online.All
                      stakeholders – yes, including publishers3 – agree that
                      open access is a worthwhileobjective. Yet, despite willing
                      stakeholders and a plethora of funder and
                      institutionalmandates,4 the disappointing progress to 100
                      $\%$ Open Access suggests thatthe current models, like Green
                      and Gold, cannot overcome what must be significantsystemic
                      friction in the scholarly communication process. If Green,
                      Gold and othermodels (like Knowledge Unlatched for books,
                      see chapter 2e) are not delivering resultsfast enough, is
                      there another open access model that could overcome the
                      systemicfrictions more easily? Might this model be Freemium
                      Open Access?},
      keywords     = {Open Access (gnd) / Wissenschaftskommunikation (gnd) / Open
                      Access (gnd) / Bibliothek (gnd)},
      ddc          = {070.57973},
      pnm          = {899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)7},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/847940},
}