001     848308
005     20210129234050.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1111/gcb.14097
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1354-1013
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1365-2486
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a pmid:29460467
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000437281500021
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:33417672
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2018-03553
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |a Colombo, Roberto
|0 0000-0003-3997-0576
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Variability of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence according to stand age-related processes in a managed loblolly pine forest
260 _ _ |a Oxford [u.a.]
|c 2018
|b Wiley-Blackwell
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1530103586_28400
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Leaf fluorescence can be used to track plant development and stress, and is considered the most direct measurement of photosynthetic activity available from remote sensing techniques. Red and far‐red sun‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) maps were generated from high spatial resolution images collected with the HyPlant airborne spectrometer over even‐aged loblolly pine plantations in North Carolina (United States). Canopy fluorescence yield (i.e., the fluorescence flux normalized by the light absorbed) in the red and far‐red peaks was computed. This quantifies the fluorescence emission efficiencies that are more directly linked to canopy function compared to SIF radiances. Fluorescence fluxes and yields were investigated in relation to tree age to infer new insights on the potential of those measurements in better describing ecosystem processes. The results showed that red fluorescence yield varies with stand age. Young stands exhibited a nearly twofold higher red fluorescence yield than mature forest plantations, while the far‐red fluorescence yield remained constant. We interpreted this finding in a context of photosynthetic stomatal limitation in aging loblolly pine stands. Current and future satellite missions provide global datasets of SIF at coarse spatial resolution, resulting in intrapixel mixture effects, which could be a confounding factor for fluorescence signal interpretation. To mitigate this effect, we propose a surrogate of the fluorescence yield, namely the Canopy Cover Fluorescence Index (CCFI) that accounts for the spatial variability in canopy structure by exploiting the vegetation fractional cover. It was found that spatial aggregation tended to mask the effective relationships, while the CCFI was still able to maintain this link. This study is a first attempt in interpreting the fluorescence variability in aging forest stands and it may open new perspectives in understanding long‐term forest dynamics in response to future climatic conditions from remote sensing of SIF.
536 _ _ |a 582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|c POF3-582
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Celesti, Marco
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Bianchi, Remo
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Campbell, Petya K. E.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Cogliati, Sergio
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Cook, Bruce D.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Corp, Lawrence A.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Damm, Alexander
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Domec, Jean-Christophe
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Guanter, Luis
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Julitta, Tommaso
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Middleton, Elizabeth M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Noormets, Asko
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Panigada, Cinzia
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Pinto, Francisco
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)138884
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Rascher, Uwe
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129388
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Rossini, Micol
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 16
700 1 _ |a Schickling, Anke
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)7338
|b 17
773 _ _ |a 10.1111/gcb.14097
|g Vol. 24, no. 7, p. 2980 - 2996
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2020313-5
|n 7
|p 2980 - 2996
|t Global change biology
|v 24
|y 2018
|x 1354-1013
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:848308
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 15
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129388
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Plant Science
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL : 2015
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21