% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Schnepf:848357,
author = {Schnepf, A. and Huber, K. and Landl, M. and Meunier, F. and
Petrich, L. and Schmidt, V.},
title = {{S}tatistical {C}haracterization of the {R}oot {S}ystem
{A}rchitecture {M}odel {CR}oot{B}ox},
journal = {Vadose zone journal},
volume = {17},
number = {1},
issn = {1539-1663},
address = {Madison, Wis.},
publisher = {SSSA},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-03598},
pages = {},
year = {2018},
abstract = {The connection between the parametrization of
three-dimensional (3D) root architecture models and
characteristic measures of the simulated root systems is
often not obvious. We used statistical methods to analyze
the simulation outcome of the root architecture model
CRootBox and built meta-models that determine the dependency
of root system measures on model input parameters. Starting
with a reference parameter set, we varied selected input
parameters one at a time and used CRootBox to compute 1000
root system realizations as well as their root system
measures. The obtained data sets were then statistically
analyzed with regard to dependencies between input
parameters, as well as distributions and correlations
between different root system measures. While absolute root
system measures (e.g., total root length) were approximately
normally distributed, distributions of ratios of root system
measures (e.g., root tip density) were highly asymmetric and
could be approximated with inverse gamma distributions. We
derived regression models (meta-models) that link
significant model parameters to 18 widely used root system
measures and determined correlations between different root
system measures. Statistical analysis of 3D root
architecture models helps to understand the impact of input
parametrization on specific root architectural measures. Our
developed meta-models can be used to determine the effect of
parameter variations on the distribution of root system
measures without running a full simulation. Model
intercomparison and benchmarking of root architecture models
is still missing. Our approach provides a means to compare
different models with each other and with experimental
data.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000439708700001},
doi = {10.2136/vzj2017.12.0212},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/848357},
}