% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Schlr:849936,
author = {Schlör, H. and Venghaus, S. and Zapp, P. and Marx, J. and
Schreiber, A. and Hake, J.-Fr.},
title = {{T}he energy-mineral-society nexus – {A} social {LCA}
model},
journal = {Applied energy},
volume = {228},
number = {2018},
issn = {0306-2619},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-04031},
pages = {999 - 1008},
year = {2018},
abstract = {Renewable energy technologies such as direct-drive wind
turbines based on permanent magnets need non-renewable
resources such as rare earth minerals. The analysis of this
nexus requires a better understanding of the complex
interactions not only between these two sectors, but also
between the natural environment and human society,
characterized as the energy-mineral-society nexus (EMS
nexus). The EMS nexus is analysed using an extended social
life cycle assessment (sLCA) model and scenario approach.
For this new social LCA the Social Hotspots Database (SHDB)
is used to analyse rare earth production in Australia,
Malaysia (Mount Weld process), USA (Mountain Pass process
II), and China (Bayan Obo process).On the basis of the
Social Hotspots Database (SHDB), the sLCA model allows to
determine the social footprint of the production of rare
earth elements based permanent magnets for 2012. Furthermore
the social LCA model approach also enables a new
interpretation of the societal life cycle costing (sLCC).
The social risks are monetized for the three rare earth
production chains. By integrating the Human Development
Index (HDI), the new approach allows a novel scenario
estimation of the social footprint and the social risk
intensity for the three rare earth production sites.In
addition to the scientific contribution, the results provide
a central input for the public discussion about corporate
social compliance, according to which companies try to
improve the social standards along their global value chains
in line with the social accountability 8000 (SA8000)
standard.},
cin = {IEK-STE},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
pnm = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000447479400080},
doi = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.048},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/849936},
}