000849992 001__ 849992
000849992 005__ 20210129234403.0
000849992 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1037/xhp0000561
000849992 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0096-1523
000849992 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1939-1277
000849992 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/19506
000849992 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:29975096
000849992 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000442590900001
000849992 037__ $$aFZJ-2018-04080
000849992 082__ $$a150
000849992 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131693$$aLangner, Robert$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000849992 245__ $$aWhen specific action biases meet nonspecific preparation: Event repetition modulates the variable-foreperiod effect.
000849992 260__ $$a[Washington]$$bAmerican Psychological Association$$c2018
000849992 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000849992 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000849992 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1533190042_30507
000849992 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000849992 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000849992 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000849992 500__ $$aThis work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (LA 3071/3-1 to R.L. & S.B.E.) and the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 7202070 (HBP SGA1 to S.B.E.).
000849992 520__ $$aPreparing for the moment of action speeds up reaction time (RT) performance even if the particular response is unknown beforehand. When the preparatory interval, or foreperiod (FP), varies unpredictably between trials, responses usually become faster with increasing FP length. This variable-FP effect has been demonstrated to partly originate from trial-to-trial sequential effects of FP length, which are asymmetric as they occur mainly in short-FP but not in long-FP trials. In two experiments, we examined whether and how event-specific biases arising from previous target processing and responding affect both variable-FP and sequential FP effects. We found that trial-to-trial repetitions (vs. alternations) of imperative events produced response time benefits in short-FP but not in long-FP trials, almost eliminating the variable-FP effect, while the sequential FP effect remained intact. This asymmetric contribution to speeded performance in variable-FP settings suggests that sequential event-specific biases may be highly transient and not necessarily an integral part of the mental representations that guide time-based expectancy, or may be overridden by high levels of nonspecific preparation in long-FP trials. In conclusion, temporal preparation appears to be a nonspecific mechanism (i.e., generally not bound to particular event features) for prioritizing certain positions on the mental time line, on which event-specific short-term biases are superimposed if time-based preparation is weak. (PsycINFO Database Record.
000849992 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574$$a574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574)$$cPOF3-574$$fPOF III$$x0
000849992 536__ $$0G:(EU-Grant)720270$$aHBP SGA1 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 1 (720270)$$c720270$$fH2020-Adhoc-2014-20$$x1
000849992 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000849992 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSteinborn, Michael B.$$b1
000849992 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aEickhoff, Simon$$b2$$ufzj
000849992 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHuestegge, Lynn$$b3
000849992 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2067413-2$$a10.1037/xhp0000561$$pNo Pagination Specified$$tJournal of experimental psychology / Human perception and performance$$v $$x0096-1523$$y2018
000849992 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/849992/files/Langner18a.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000849992 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/849992/files/Langner18a.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
000849992 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/849992/files/Langner18a.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yOpenAccess
000849992 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/849992/files/Langner18a.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000849992 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/849992/files/Langner18a.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
000849992 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:849992$$pdnbdelivery$$pec_fundedresources$$pVDB$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000849992 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131693$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000849992 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000849992 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$vTheory, modelling and simulation$$x0
000849992 9141_ $$y2018
000849992 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000849992 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index
000849992 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000849992 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN : 2015
000849992 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
000849992 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000849992 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000849992 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000849992 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000849992 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000849992 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000849992 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000849992 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000849992 920__ $$lyes
000849992 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
000849992 980__ $$ajournal
000849992 980__ $$aVDB
000849992 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000849992 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
000849992 9801_ $$aFullTexts