001     850195
005     20210129234523.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1038/srep37146
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/19377
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a pmid:27849001
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000388081000001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2018-04269
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 000
100 1 _ |a Müller-Caspary, Knut
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)165314
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Materials characterisation by angle-resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy
260 _ _ |a London
|c 2016
|b Nature Publishing Group
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1531836757_18941
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Solid-state properties such as strain or chemical composition often leave characteristic fingerprints in the angular dependence of electron scattering. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) is dedicated to probe scattered intensity with atomic resolution, but it drastically lacks angular resolution. Here we report both a setup to exploit the explicit angular dependence of scattered intensity and applications of angle-resolved STEM to semiconductor nanostructures. Our method is applied to measure nitrogen content and specimen thickness in a GaNxAs1−x layer independently at atomic resolution by evaluating two dedicated angular intervals. We demonstrate contrast formation due to strain and composition in a Si- based metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) with GexSi1−x stressors as a function of the angles used for imaging. To shed light on the validity of current theoretical approaches this data is compared with theory, namely the Rutherford approach and contemporary multislice simulations. Inconsistency is found for the Rutherford model in the whole angular range of 16–255 mrad. Contrary, the multislice simulations are applicable for angles larger than 35 mrad whereas a significant mismatch is observed at lower angles. This limitation of established simulations is discussed particularly on the basis of inelastic scattering.
536 _ _ |a 143 - Controlling Configuration-Based Phenomena (POF3-143)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-143
|c POF3-143
|f POF III
|x 0
700 1 _ |a Oppermann, Oliver
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Grieb, Tim
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Krause, Florian F.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Rosenauer, Andreas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Marco
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
773 _ _ |a 10.1038/srep37146
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2615211-3
|p 37146
|t Scientific reports
|v 6
|y 2016
|x 2045-2322
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850195/files/srep37146.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850195/files/srep37146.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850195/files/srep37146.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850195/files/srep37146.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850195/files/srep37146.jpg?subformat=icon-640
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:850195
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)165314
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Future Information Technology - Fundamentals, Novel Concepts and Energy Efficiency (FIT)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-140
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-143
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Controlling Configuration-Based Phenomena
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b SCI REP-UK : 2015
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b SCI REP-UK : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)ER-C-1-20170209
|k ER-C-1
|l Physik Nanoskaliger Systeme
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ER-C-1-20170209
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21