000850310 001__ 850310
000850310 005__ 20210129234549.0
000850310 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.jplph.2018.04.010
000850310 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0176-1617
000850310 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1618-1328
000850310 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:29735176
000850310 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000439100400005
000850310 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:39730000
000850310 037__ $$aFZJ-2018-04352
000850310 041__ $$aEnglish
000850310 082__ $$a580
000850310 1001_ $$00000-0001-7611-0431$$aSundgren, Tove Kristina$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000850310 245__ $$aRapid seedling establishment and a narrow root stele promotes waterlogging tolerance in spring wheat
000850310 260__ $$aMünchen$$bElsevier$$c2018
000850310 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000850310 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000850310 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1534243902_7179
000850310 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000850310 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000850310 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000850310 520__ $$aImproving the waterlogging tolerance of wheat varieties could alleviate yield constraints caused by excessive rain and poor soil drainage. In this study, we investigated root and shoot growth as well as anatomical traits of six spring wheat genotypes with contrasting waterlogging tolerance properties. Our aim was to identify root traits that differentiate tolerant from sensitive genotypes. Two experiments were conducted using rhizoboxes and photography for data acquisition. In experiment one, root growth of the genotypes was studied during seedling establishment and a subsequent waterlogging treatment, starting at the 3-leaf stage and maintained for seven days. In the second experiment, root and shoot growth of previously waterlogged plants was compared between the genotypes during seven days of recovery. At harvest of experiment two, root segments were sampled to investigate genotype differences of root cross sectional area, root cortex area, stele area and percentage of aerenchyma. The results show that tolerant, in contrast to sensitive genotypes, developed seminal roots faster in the seedling establishment phase and more nodal roots during the waterlogging treatment. NK93602 and Bjarne were the best performing genotypes. Bjarne in particular had a narrower relative stele size of nodal (13.4%) and seminal roots (11.7%) compared to other genotypes (e.g. 16.3% in nodal roots and 13.9% in seminal roots of sensitive Quarna). The results from this study suggests that early vigor is an important trait for waterlogging tolerance in the field. Anatomical root traits, such as a narrow stele and aerenchyma may contribute to improving waterlogging tolerance furthermore.
000850310 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$a582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)$$cPOF3-582$$fPOF III$$x0
000850310 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000850310 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aUhlen, Anne Kjersti$$b1
000850310 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLillemo, Morten$$b2
000850310 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145988$$aBriese, Christoph$$b3
000850310 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)156560$$aWojciechowski, Tobias$$b4
000850310 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2029184-X$$a10.1016/j.jplph.2018.04.010$$gp. S0176161718301159$$p45-55$$tJournal of plant physiology$$v227$$x0176-1617$$y2018
000850310 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850310/files/1-s2.0-S0176161718301159-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000850310 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850310/files/1-s2.0-S0176161718301159-main.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000850310 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850310/files/1-s2.0-S0176161718301159-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000850310 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850310/files/1-s2.0-S0176161718301159-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000850310 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850310/files/1-s2.0-S0176161718301159-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000850310 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850310/files/1-s2.0-S0176161718301159-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000850310 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:850310$$pVDB
000850310 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)156560$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000850310 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lKey Technologies for the Bioeconomy$$vPlant Science$$x0
000850310 9141_ $$y2018
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ PLANT PHYSIOL : 2015
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000850310 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000850310 920__ $$lyes
000850310 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000850310 980__ $$ajournal
000850310 980__ $$aVDB
000850310 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000850310 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED