Home > Publications database > Rapid seedling establishment and a narrow root stele promotes waterlogging tolerance in spring wheat > print

001     850310
005     20210129234549.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.jplph.2018.04.010
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0176-1617
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1618-1328
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a pmid:29735176
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000439100400005
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:39730000
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2018-04352
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 580
100 1 _ |a Sundgren, Tove Kristina
|0 0000-0001-7611-0431
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Rapid seedling establishment and a narrow root stele promotes waterlogging tolerance in spring wheat
260 _ _ |a München
|c 2018
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1534243902_7179
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Improving the waterlogging tolerance of wheat varieties could alleviate yield constraints caused by excessive rain and poor soil drainage. In this study, we investigated root and shoot growth as well as anatomical traits of six spring wheat genotypes with contrasting waterlogging tolerance properties. Our aim was to identify root traits that differentiate tolerant from sensitive genotypes. Two experiments were conducted using rhizoboxes and photography for data acquisition. In experiment one, root growth of the genotypes was studied during seedling establishment and a subsequent waterlogging treatment, starting at the 3-leaf stage and maintained for seven days. In the second experiment, root and shoot growth of previously waterlogged plants was compared between the genotypes during seven days of recovery. At harvest of experiment two, root segments were sampled to investigate genotype differences of root cross sectional area, root cortex area, stele area and percentage of aerenchyma. The results show that tolerant, in contrast to sensitive genotypes, developed seminal roots faster in the seedling establishment phase and more nodal roots during the waterlogging treatment. NK93602 and Bjarne were the best performing genotypes. Bjarne in particular had a narrower relative stele size of nodal (13.4%) and seminal roots (11.7%) compared to other genotypes (e.g. 16.3% in nodal roots and 13.9% in seminal roots of sensitive Quarna). The results from this study suggests that early vigor is an important trait for waterlogging tolerance in the field. Anatomical root traits, such as a narrow stele and aerenchyma may contribute to improving waterlogging tolerance furthermore.
536 _ _ |a 582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|c POF3-582
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Uhlen, Anne Kjersti
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Lillemo, Morten
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Briese, Christoph
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145988
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Wojciechowski, Tobias
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)156560
|b 4
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.jplph.2018.04.010
|g p. S0176161718301159
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2029184-X
|p 45-55
|t Journal of plant physiology
|v 227
|y 2018
|x 0176-1617
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850310/files/1-s2.0-S0176161718301159-main.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850310/files/1-s2.0-S0176161718301159-main.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850310/files/1-s2.0-S0176161718301159-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850310/files/1-s2.0-S0176161718301159-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850310/files/1-s2.0-S0176161718301159-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850310/files/1-s2.0-S0176161718301159-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:850310
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)156560
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Plant Science
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J PLANT PHYSIOL : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21