000850711 001__ 850711
000850711 005__ 20210129234611.0
000850711 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1002/jnr.24308
000850711 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0360-4012
000850711 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1097-4547
000850711 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:30027567
000850711 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000456338100006
000850711 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:45360727
000850711 037__ $$aFZJ-2018-04512
000850711 082__ $$a570
000850711 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)165363$$aHöchenberger, Richard$$b0
000850711 245__ $$aA bittersweet symphony: Evidence for taste-sound correspondences without effects on taste quality-specific perception
000850711 260__ $$aNew York, NY [u.a.]$$bWiley-Liss$$c2019
000850711 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000850711 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000850711 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1548318542_3165
000850711 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000850711 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000850711 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000850711 520__ $$aMusic has been associated with taste and shown to influence the dining experience. We asked whether sound that is associated with taste affects taste perception of food. In two studies (study 1: N = 20, 13 women; study 2: N = 20, 17 women), participants evaluated the taste of cinder toffee while listening to either of two soundscapes associated with sweet and bitter taste, respectively, or no sound. In study 1, participants rated the taste on a visual‐analog scale (VAS) anchored with “bitter” and “sweet”, aiming to replicate a previous study (Crisinel et al., 2012). In contrast, four separate scales were used in study 2 to report the extent of bitter, sweet, sour, and salty taste to test whether taste qualities were influenced by sound differentially. Additionally, taste intensity and pleasantness were rated in both studies. Taste intensity was increased in the presence of a sound, while pleasantness was not affected. In study 1, sound shifted bitter‐sweet ratings in the direction of the congruent sound, i.e. samples tasted sweeter with “sweet” sound and more bitter with “bitter” sound, replicating Crisinel et al.'s (2012) results. However, this effect was abolished when a “no‐sound” control was included in the statistical model. Taste ratings in study 2 showed no effect of sound on any specific taste quality, suggesting that the influence of sound on taste in study 1 reflects an artifact of the scale rather than an actual shift in perception. Together, the data provide evidence for taste‐sound correspondences without effects on taste‐quality specific perception.
000850711 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$a572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)$$cPOF3-572$$fPOF III$$x0
000850711 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000850711 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)165362$$aOhla, Kathrin$$b1$$eCorresponding author
000850711 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1474904-x$$a10.1002/jnr.24308$$n3$$p267-275$$tJournal of neuroscience research$$v97$$x0360-4012$$y2019
000850711 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850711/files/H%C3%B6chenberger_Ohla_Post%20Print_JNR_Bitter-sweet-1.docx$$yRestricted
000850711 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850711/files/H-chenberger_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Neuroscience_Research.pdf$$yRestricted
000850711 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850711/files/H-chenberger_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Neuroscience_Research.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000850711 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:850711$$pVDB
000850711 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)165363$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000850711 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)165362$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000850711 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x0
000850711 9141_ $$y2019
000850711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000850711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ NEUROSCI RES : 2015
000850711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000850711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000850711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000850711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000850711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000850711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000850711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000850711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000850711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000850711 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000850711 920__ $$lyes
000850711 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000850711 980__ $$ajournal
000850711 980__ $$aVDB
000850711 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000850711 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED