% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Hchenberger:850711,
      author       = {Höchenberger, Richard and Ohla, Kathrin},
      title        = {{A} bittersweet symphony: {E}vidence for taste-sound
                      correspondences without effects on taste quality-specific
                      perception},
      journal      = {Journal of neuroscience research},
      volume       = {97},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {0360-4012},
      address      = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Wiley-Liss},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-04512},
      pages        = {267-275},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {Music has been associated with taste and shown to influence
                      the dining experience. We asked whether sound that is
                      associated with taste affects taste perception of food. In
                      two studies (study 1: N = 20, 13 women; study 2:
                      N = 20, 17 women), participants evaluated the taste of
                      cinder toffee while listening to either of two soundscapes
                      associated with sweet and bitter taste, respectively, or no
                      sound. In study 1, participants rated the taste on a
                      visual‐analog scale (VAS) anchored with “bitter” and
                      “sweet”, aiming to replicate a previous study (Crisinel
                      et al., 2012). In contrast, four separate scales were used
                      in study 2 to report the extent of bitter, sweet, sour, and
                      salty taste to test whether taste qualities were influenced
                      by sound differentially. Additionally, taste intensity and
                      pleasantness were rated in both studies. Taste intensity was
                      increased in the presence of a sound, while pleasantness was
                      not affected. In study 1, sound shifted bitter‐sweet
                      ratings in the direction of the congruent sound, i.e.
                      samples tasted sweeter with “sweet” sound and more
                      bitter with “bitter” sound, replicating Crisinel et
                      al.'s (2012) results. However, this effect was abolished
                      when a “no‐sound” control was included in the
                      statistical model. Taste ratings in study 2 showed no effect
                      of sound on any specific taste quality, suggesting that the
                      influence of sound on taste in study 1 reflects an artifact
                      of the scale rather than an actual shift in perception.
                      Together, the data provide evidence for taste‐sound
                      correspondences without effects on taste‐quality specific
                      perception.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {570},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:30027567},
      UT           = {WOS:000456338100006},
      doi          = {10.1002/jnr.24308},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/850711},
}