% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Placke:851114,
      author       = {Placke, Tobias and Kloepsch, Richard and Dühnen, Simon and
                      Winter, Martin},
      title        = {{L}ithium ion, lithium metal, and alternative rechargeable
                      battery technologies: the odyssey for high energy density},
      journal      = {Journal of solid state electrochemistry},
      volume       = {21},
      number       = {7},
      issn         = {1433-0768},
      address      = {Berlin},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-04816},
      pages        = {1939 - 1964},
      year         = {2017},
      abstract     = {Since their market introduction in 1991, lithium ion
                      batteries (LIBs) have developed evolutionary in terms of
                      their specific energies (Wh/kg) and energy densities (Wh/L).
                      Currently, they do not only dominate the small format
                      battery market for portable electronic devices, but have
                      also been successfully implemented as the technology of
                      choice for electromobility as well as for stationary energy
                      storage. Besides LIBs, a variety of different
                      technologically promising battery concepts exists that,
                      depending on the respective technology, might also be
                      suitable for various application purposes. These systems of
                      the “next generation,” the so-called post-lithium ion
                      batteries (PLIBs), such as metal/sulfur, metal/air or
                      metal/oxygen, or “post-lithium technologies” (systems
                      without Li), which are based on alternative single (Na+, K+)
                      or multivalent ions (Mg2+, Ca2+), are currently being
                      studied intensively. From today’s point of view, it seems
                      quite clear that there will not only be a single technology
                      for all applications (technology monopoly), but different
                      battery systems, which can be especially suitable or
                      combined for a particular application (technology
                      diversity). In this review, we place the lithium ion
                      technology in a historical context and give insights into
                      the battery technology diversity that evolved during the
                      past decades and which will, in turn, influence future
                      research and development.},
      cin          = {IEK-12},
      ddc          = {540},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217},
      pnm          = {131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000405520700008},
      doi          = {10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851114},
}