% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Vay:851194,
author = {Vay, Sabine Ulrike and Flitsch, Lea Jessica and Rabenstein,
Monika and Rogall, Rebecca and Blaschke, Stefan and
Kleinhaus, Judith and Reinert, Noémie and Bach, Annika and
Fink, Gereon Rudolf and Schroeter, Michael and Rueger, Maria
Adele},
title = {{T}he plasticity of primary microglia and their
multifaceted effects on endogenous neural stem cells in
vitro and in vivo},
journal = {Journal of neuroinflammation},
volume = {15},
number = {1},
issn = {1742-2094},
address = {London},
publisher = {BioMed Central},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-04894},
pages = {226},
year = {2018},
abstract = {BackgroundMicroglia—the resident immune cells of the
brain—are activated after brain lesions, e.g., cerebral
ischemia, and polarize towards a classic “M1”
pro-inflammatory or an alternative “M2”
anti-inflammatory phenotype following characteristic
temporo-spatial patterns, contributing either to secondary
tissue damage or to regenerative responses. They closely
interact with endogenous neural stem cells (NSCs) residing
in distinct niches of the adult brain. The current study
aimed at elucidating the dynamics of microglia polarization
and their differential effects on NSC
function.ResultsPrimary rat microglia in vitro were
polarized towards a M1 phenotype by LPS, or to a M2
phenotype by IL4, while simultaneous exposure to LPS plus
IL4 resulted in a hybrid phenotype expressing both M1- and
M2-characteristic markers. M2 microglia migrated less but
exhibit higher phagocytic activity than M1 microglia.
Defined mediators switched microglia from one polarization
state to the other, a process more effective when
transforming M2 microglia towards M1 than vice versa.
Polarized microglia had differential effects on the
differentiation potential of NSCs in vitro and in vivo, with
M1 microglia promoting astrocytogenesis, while M2 microglia
supported neurogenesis. Regardless of their polarization,
microglia inhibited NSC proliferation, increased NSC
migration, and accelerated NSC
differentiation.ConclusionOverall, this study shed light on
the complex conditions governing microglia polarization and
the effects of differentially polarized microglia on
critical functions of NSCs in vitro and in vivo. Refining
the understanding of microglia activation and their
modulatory effects on NSCs is likely to facilitate the
development of innovative therapeutic concepts supporting
the innate regenerative capacity of the brain.},
cin = {INM-3},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
pnm = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:30103769},
UT = {WOS:000441501400001},
doi = {10.1186/s12974-018-1261-y},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851194},
}