000851312 001__ 851312
000851312 005__ 20210129234838.0
000851312 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1093/aob/mcy092
000851312 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0003-4754
000851312 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0305-7364
000851312 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1095-8290
000851312 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:29982363
000851312 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000442923400014
000851312 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:44763705
000851312 037__ $$aFZJ-2018-05002
000851312 041__ $$aEnglish
000851312 082__ $$a580
000851312 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRangarajan, Harini$$b0
000851312 245__ $$aCo-optimization of axial root phenotypes for nitrogen and phosphorus acquisition in common bean
000851312 260__ $$aOxford$$bOxford University Press$$c2018
000851312 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000851312 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000851312 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1536150465_464
000851312 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000851312 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000851312 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000851312 520__ $$aBackground and Aims: Root architecture is a primary determinant of soil resource acquisition. We hypothesized that root architectural phenes will display both positive and negative interactions with each other for soil resource capture because of competition for internal resources and functional trade-offs in soil exploration.Methods: We employed the functional–structural plant model SimRoot to explore how interactions among architectural phenes in common bean determine the acquisition of phosphate and nitrate, two key soil resources contrasting in mobility. We evaluated the utility of basal root whorl number (BRWN) when basal root growth angle, hypocotyl-borne roots and lateral root branching density (LRBD) were varied, under varying availability of phosphate and nitrate.Key Results: Three basal root whorls were optimal in most phenotypes. This optimum shifted towards greater values when LRBD decreased and to smaller numbers when LRBD increased. The maximum biomass accumulated for a given BRWN phenotype in a given limiting nutrient scenario depended upon root growth angle. Under phosphorus stress shallow phenotypes grew best, whereas under nitrate stress fanned phenotypes grew best. The effect of increased hypocotyl-borne roots depended upon BRWN as well as the limiting nutrient. Greater production of axial roots due to BRWN or hypocotyl-borne roots reduced rooting depth, leading to reduced biomass under nitrate-limiting conditions. Increased BRWN as well as greater LRBD increased root carbon consumption, resulting in reduced shoot biomass.Conclusions: We conclude that the utility of a root architectural phenotype is determined by whether the constituent phenes are synergistic or antagonistic. Competition for internal resources and trade-offs for external resources result in multiple phenotypes being optimal under a given nutrient regime. We also find that no single phenotype is optimal across contrasting environments. These results have implications for understanding plant evolution and also for the breeding of more stress-tolerant crop phenotypes.
000851312 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$a582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)$$cPOF3-582$$fPOF III$$x0
000851312 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000851312 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)144879$$aPostma, Johannes$$b1
000851312 7001_ $$00000-0002-7265-9790$$aLynch, Jonathan P$$b2$$eCorresponding author
000851312 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1461328-1$$a10.1093/aob/mcy092$$n3$$p485-499$$tAnnals of botany$$v122$$x1095-8290$$y2018
000851312 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851312/files/mcy092.pdf$$yRestricted
000851312 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851312/files/mcy092.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000851312 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:851312$$pVDB
000851312 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)144879$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000851312 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lKey Technologies for the Bioeconomy$$vPlant Science$$x0
000851312 9141_ $$y2018
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0400$$2StatID$$aAllianz-Lizenz / DFG
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0430$$2StatID$$aNational-Konsortium
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bANN BOT-LONDON : 2015
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000851312 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000851312 920__ $$lyes
000851312 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000851312 980__ $$ajournal
000851312 980__ $$aVDB
000851312 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000851312 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED