% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Luo:851403,
      author       = {Luo, F-L and Matsubara, Shizue and Chen, Y and Wei, G-W and
                      Dong, B-C and Zhang, M-X and Yu, F-H},
      title        = {{C}onsecutive submergence and de-submergence both impede
                      growth of a riparian plant during water level fluctuations
                      with different frequencies},
      journal      = {Environmental and experimental botany},
      volume       = {155},
      issn         = {0098-8472},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-05052},
      pages        = {641-649},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {Repeated exposure to submergence and de-submergence may
                      induce acclimation in plants growing in riparian areas.
                      However, the effect of each consecutive submergence and
                      de-submergence event has not been evaluated separately. We
                      subjected a riparian species Alternanthera philoxeroides to
                      two different fluctuation frequencies: low fluctuation
                      frequency (LFF) and high fluctuation frequency (HFF).
                      Consecutive submergence and de-submergence had comparable
                      negative effects on growth of A. philoxeroides, while they
                      respectively down- and up-regulated photosynthetic electron
                      transport in both LFF and HFF. The submergence effects on
                      growth were significantly smaller in the 2nd cycle than in
                      the 1 st cycle of LFF, suggesting reduced tissue loss in
                      the 2nd cycle as a result of acclimation. In HFF, the growth
                      of A. philoxeroides was more strongly suppressed than in
                      LFF. During de-submergence, biomass increased in both
                      control and de-submerged plants in LFF, whereas growth
                      recovery was not always seen in HFF. At the end of the
                      experiment, the treatment plants in HFF had only $∼50\%$
                      biomass of the corresponding plants in LFF. Although HFF
                      enhances tissue loss during submergence and thus impairs
                      growth recovery more strongly during de-submergence than
                      LFF, both LFF and HFF induced photosynthetic,
                      photoprotective or growth acclimation in A. philoxeroides.},
      cin          = {IBG-2},
      ddc          = {580},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
      pnm          = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000446289500060},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.08.015},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851403},
}