000851535 001__ 851535
000851535 005__ 20210129234936.0
000851535 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.232
000851535 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0959-6526
000851535 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1879-1786
000851535 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000447568700047
000851535 037__ $$aFZJ-2018-05161
000851535 082__ $$a690
000851535 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130467$$aKuckshinrichs, Wilhelm$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000851535 245__ $$aLevelized costs of energy from private and social perspectives: The case of improved alkaline water electrolysis
000851535 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2018
000851535 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000851535 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000851535 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1536570613_26060
000851535 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000851535 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000851535 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000851535 520__ $$aThe concept of the levelized cost of energy or respectively hydrogen (LCH) is frequently chosen for techno-economic analyses of energy technologies. However, the results of the LCH very much depend on the assessment perspective, which may be either private (or synonymously business) or social. The paper identifies three points as being basically responsible for differences: (1) tax deductibility of cost components, (2) external environmental costs, and (3) discounting.The objectives of the paper are to present the levelized cost of hydrogen for improved alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) and to highlight the different results from private and social perspectives. Accordingly, the methodology comprises the different LCH calculation schemes, an energy scenario focusing on electricity, a Life Cycle Assessment for environmental impacts of AWE technology, and the monetary valuation of these impacts.As a case study, we chose the production of hydrogen from advanced alkaline water electrolysis at three different sites in Europe (Germany, Austria, and Spain). The paper shows that the private and social LCH differ strongly. Inclusion of all cost components and comparatively low discount rates provoke highest LCH from social perspective. The main differences in the case study presented here are due to full accounting for environmental costs – with the global warming potential resulting from electricity generation as the main environmental cost source – and due to electricity price projections. Finally, the paper also discusses the sensitivity of LCHs with respect to parameters such as plant lifetime, monetary values of CO2, and tax rates.
000851535 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153$$a153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)$$cPOF3-153$$fPOF III$$x0
000851535 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000851535 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)158005$$aKoj, Jan Christian$$b1$$ufzj
000851535 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2029338-0$$a10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.232$$gVol. 203, p. 619 - 632$$p619 - 632$$tJournal of cleaner production$$v203$$x0959-6526$$y2018
000851535 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851535/files/1-s2.0-S0959652618325812-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000851535 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851535/files/1-s2.0-S0959652618325812-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000851535 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:851535$$pVDB
000851535 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130467$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000851535 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)158005$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000851535 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lTechnologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft$$vAssessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security$$x0
000851535 9141_ $$y2018
000851535 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000851535 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000851535 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ CLEAN PROD : 2015
000851535 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000851535 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000851535 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000851535 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000851535 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000851535 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000851535 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000851535 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
000851535 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000851535 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013$$kIEK-STE$$lSystemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung$$x0
000851535 980__ $$ajournal
000851535 980__ $$aVDB
000851535 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
000851535 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED