001     851535
005     20210129234936.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.232
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0959-6526
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1879-1786
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000447568700047
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2018-05161
082 _ _ |a 690
100 1 _ |a Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130467
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Levelized costs of energy from private and social perspectives: The case of improved alkaline water electrolysis
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2018
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1536570613_26060
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The concept of the levelized cost of energy or respectively hydrogen (LCH) is frequently chosen for techno-economic analyses of energy technologies. However, the results of the LCH very much depend on the assessment perspective, which may be either private (or synonymously business) or social. The paper identifies three points as being basically responsible for differences: (1) tax deductibility of cost components, (2) external environmental costs, and (3) discounting.The objectives of the paper are to present the levelized cost of hydrogen for improved alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) and to highlight the different results from private and social perspectives. Accordingly, the methodology comprises the different LCH calculation schemes, an energy scenario focusing on electricity, a Life Cycle Assessment for environmental impacts of AWE technology, and the monetary valuation of these impacts.As a case study, we chose the production of hydrogen from advanced alkaline water electrolysis at three different sites in Europe (Germany, Austria, and Spain). The paper shows that the private and social LCH differ strongly. Inclusion of all cost components and comparatively low discount rates provoke highest LCH from social perspective. The main differences in the case study presented here are due to full accounting for environmental costs – with the global warming potential resulting from electricity generation as the main environmental cost source – and due to electricity price projections. Finally, the paper also discusses the sensitivity of LCHs with respect to parameters such as plant lifetime, monetary values of CO2, and tax rates.
536 _ _ |a 153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|c POF3-153
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Koj, Jan Christian
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)158005
|b 1
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.232
|g Vol. 203, p. 619 - 632
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2029338-0
|p 619 - 632
|t Journal of cleaner production
|v 203
|y 2018
|x 0959-6526
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851535/files/1-s2.0-S0959652618325812-main.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851535/files/1-s2.0-S0959652618325812-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:851535
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130467
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)158005
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Technologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J CLEAN PROD : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
|k IEK-STE
|l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21