% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hecht:851721,
author = {Hecht, V. L. and Temperton, V. M. and Nagel, Kerstin and
Rascher, U. and Pude, R. and Postma, Johannes A.},
title = {{P}lant density modifies root system architecture in spring
barley ({H}ordeum vulgare {L}.) through a change in nodal
root number},
journal = {Plant and soil},
volume = {439},
number = {1-2},
issn = {1573-5036},
address = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-05253},
pages = {179-200},
year = {2019},
abstract = {Aim: Previously, we showed that sowing density influences
root length density (RLD), specific root length (SRL)
especially in the topsoil, and shallowness of fine roots of
field grown spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Here, we ask
which trait components may explain these observed changes.
Method We grew two spring barley cultivars at contrasting
sowing densities in both field trials and rhizotrons, and
excavated root crowns and imaged root growth.Results In the
field, tiller and nodal root numbers per plant decreased
with increasing sowing density, however, nodal roots per
tiller, seminal roots per plant, and lateral branching
frequencies were not affected. Branching angle did not or
only slightly declined with increasing sowing density. In
rhizotrons, aboveground only tiller number was affected by
sowing density. Root growth rates and counts were not (or
only slightly) affected. Conclusion Greater RLD at high
sowing densities is largely explained by greater main root
number per area. The altered seminal to nodal root ratio
might explain observed increases in SRL. We conclude that
sowing density is a modifier of root system architecture
with probable functional consequences, and thereby an
important factor to be considered in root studies or the
development of root ideotypes for agriculture.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000474429100013},
doi = {10.1007/s11104-018-3764-9},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851721},
}