000851738 001__ 851738
000851738 005__ 20210129235009.0
000851738 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.08.020
000851738 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0031-9384
000851738 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1873-507X
000851738 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:30172720
000851738 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000449131400015
000851738 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:47342600
000851738 037__ $$aFZJ-2018-05265
000851738 082__ $$a570
000851738 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZoon, Harriët F. A.$$b0
000851738 245__ $$aModulation of event-related potentials to food cues upon sensory-specific satiety
000851738 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2018
000851738 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000851738 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000851738 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1536673938_25366
000851738 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000851738 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000851738 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000851738 520__ $$aTempting environmental food cues and metabolic signals are important factors in appetite regulation. Food intake reduces liking of food cues that are congruent to the food eaten (sensory-specific satiety). With this study we aimed to assess effects of sensory-specific satiety on neural processing (perceptual and evaluative) of visual and olfactory food cues.Twenty healthy female subjects (age: 20 ± 2 years; BMI: 22 ± 2 kg/m2) participated in two separate test sessions during which they consumed an ad libitum amount of a sweet or savoury meal. Before and after consumption, event-related potentials were recorded in response to visual and olfactory cues signalling high-energy sweet, high-energy savoury, low-energy sweet and low-energy savoury food and non-food items.In general, we observed that food intake led to event-related potentials with an increased negative and decreased positive amplitudes for food, but also non-food cues. Changes were most pronounced in response to high-energy sweet food pictures after a sweet meal, and occurred in early processes of perception (~80–150 ms) and later processes of cognitive evaluation (~300–700 ms).Food intake appears to lead to general changes in neural processing that are related to motivated attention, and sensory-specific changes that reflect decreased positive valence of the stimuli and/or modulation of top-down cognitive control over processing of cues congruent to the food eaten to satiety.
000851738 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$a572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)$$cPOF3-572$$fPOF III$$x0
000851738 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000851738 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)165362$$aOhla, Kathrin$$b1
000851738 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$ade Graaf, Cees$$b2
000851738 7001_ $$00000-0002-9560-6093$$aBoesveldt, Sanne$$b3$$eCorresponding author
000851738 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2008755-X$$a10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.08.020$$gVol. 196, p. 126 - 134$$p126 - 134$$tPhysiology & behavior$$v196$$x0031-9384$$y2018
000851738 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851738/files/1-s2.0-S0031938418307030-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000851738 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851738/files/1-s2.0-S0031938418307030-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000851738 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:851738$$pVDB
000851738 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)165362$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000851738 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x0
000851738 9141_ $$y2018
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bPHYSIOL BEHAV : 2015
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000851738 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000851738 920__ $$lyes
000851738 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000851738 980__ $$ajournal
000851738 980__ $$aVDB
000851738 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000851738 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED