001     851757
005     20220930130157.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3233/RNN-180815
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/20231
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a pmid:30282379
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000451336100001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2018-05281
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Kusch, M.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)165846
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Recovery from apraxic deficits and its neural correlate
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam
|c 2018
|b IOS Press
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1543494353_22948
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Background and Objective: Apraxia is a deficit of motor cognition leading to difficulties in actual tool use, imitation of gestures, and pantomiming object use. To date, little data exist regarding the recovery from apraxic deficits after stroke, and no statistical lesion mapping study investigated the neural correlate of recovery from apraxia. Accordingly, we here examined recovery from apraxic deficits, differential associations of apraxia task (imitation vs. pantomime) and effector (bucco-facial vs. limb apraxia) with recovery, and the underlying neural correlates. Methods: We assessed apraxia in 39 patients with left hemisphere (LH) stroke both at admission and approximately 11 days later. Furthermore, we collected clinical imaging data to identify brain regions associated with recovery from apraxic deficits using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM). Results:Between the two assessments, a significant recovery from apraxic deficits was observed with a tendency of enhanced recovery of limb compared to bucco-facial apraxia. VLSM analyses revealed that within the lesion pattern initially associated with apraxia, lesions of the left insula were associated with remission of apraxic deficits, whereas lesions to the (inferior) parietal lobe (IPL; supramarginal and angular gyrus) and the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) were associated with persistent apraxic deficits. Conclusions: Data suggest that lesions affecting the core regions (and white matter) of the fronto-parietal network cause more persistent apraxic deficits than lesions affecting other regions (here: the left insula) that also contribute to motor cognition and apraxic deficits.
536 _ _ |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|c POF3-572
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Schmidt, Claudia
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)169625
|b 1
|e Corresponding author
700 1 _ |a Göden, L.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Tscherpel, C.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)171739
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Stahl, J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Saliger, J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Karbe, H.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Fink, G. R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Weiss, P. H.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
773 _ _ |a 10.3233/RNN-180815
|g p. 1 - 10
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2007771-3
|n 6
|p 669–678
|t Restorative neurology and neuroscience
|v 36
|y 2018
|x 0922-6028
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851757/files/20180912164559718.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851757/files/rnn%252F2018%252F36-6%252Frnn-36-6-rnn180815%252Frnn-36-rnn180815.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851757/files/20180912164559718.pdf?subformat=pdfa
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851757/files/Kusch_2018_Postprint_Restorative%20Neurology%20and%20Neuroscience_Recovery%20from%20apraxic%20deficits%20and%20its%20neural%20correlate.pdf
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851757/files/rnn%252F2018%252F36-6%252Frnn-36-6-rnn180815%252Frnn-36-rnn180815.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851757/files/Kusch_2018_Postprint_Restorative%20Neurology%20and%20Neuroscience_Recovery%20from%20apraxic%20deficits%20and%20its%20neural%20correlate.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:851757
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)165846
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)169625
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)171739
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v (Dys-)function and Plasticity
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b RESTOR NEUROL NEUROS : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 _ _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21