001     851776
005     20210129235018.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.017
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1053-8119
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1095-9572
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a pmid:30205209
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000449385000013
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:48154954
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a 2128/23414
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2018-05291
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Mengotti, P.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)166200
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Neural correlates of the energetic value of food during visual processing and response inhibition
260 _ _ |a Orlando, Fla.
|c 2019
|b Academic Press
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1539246706_26612
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Previous research showed that human brain regions involved in reward and cognitive control are responsive to visually presented food stimuli, in particular high-energy foods. However, it is still to be determined whether the preference towards high-energy foods depends on their higher energy density (kcal/gram), or is based on the difference in energy content of the food items (total amount of kcal). Here we report the results of an fMRI study in which normal-weight healthy participants processed food images during a one-back task or were required to inhibit their response towards food stimuli during a Go/No-Go task. High-energy density (HD) and low-energy density (LD) foods were matched for energy content displayed. Food-related kitchen objects (OBJ) were used as control stimuli. The lateral occipital complex and the orbitofrontal cortex showed consistent higher activity in response to HD than LD foods, both during visual processing and response inhibition. This result suggests that images of HD foods, even when the amount of food shown is not associated with a higher energy content, elicit preferential visual processing - possibly involving attentional processes - and trigger a response from the reward system. We conclude that the human brain is able to distinguish food energy densities of food items during both active visual processing and response inhibition.
536 _ _ |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|c POF3-572
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Foroni, F.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Rumiati, R. I.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.017
|g p. S1053811918308024
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1471418-8
|p 130-139
|t NeuroImage
|v 184
|y 2019
|x 1053-8119
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851776/files/1-s2.0-S1053811918308024-main.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851776/files/1-s2.0-S1053811918308024-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/851776/files/Mengotti_NeuroImage_2019_Post%20Print_Neural%20correlates%20of%20the%20energetic%20value%20of%20food%20during%20visual%20processing%20and%20response%20inhibition.pdf
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:851776
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)166200
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v (Dys-)function and Plasticity
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b NEUROIMAGE : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b NEUROIMAGE : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21