000852457 001__ 852457
000852457 005__ 20240712100833.0
000852457 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5194/amt-11-4015-2018
000852457 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1867-1381
000852457 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1867-8548
000852457 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/19704
000852457 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000438287600002
000852457 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:48789878
000852457 037__ $$aFZJ-2018-05403
000852457 082__ $$a550
000852457 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129108$$aAfchine, Armin$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000852457 245__ $$aIce particle sampling from aircraft – influence of the probing position on the ice water content
000852457 260__ $$aKatlenburg-Lindau$$bCopernicus$$c2018
000852457 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000852457 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000852457 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1539271545_10799
000852457 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000852457 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000852457 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000852457 520__ $$aThe ice water content (IWC) of cirrus clouds is an essential parameter determining their radiative properties and thus is important for climate simulations. Therefore, for a reliable measurement of IWC on board research aircraft, it is important to carefully design the ice crystal sampling and measuring devices. During the ML-CIRRUS field campaign in 2014 with the German Gulfstream GV HALO (High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft), IWC was recorded by three closed-path total water together with one gas-phase water instrument. The hygrometers were supplied by inlets mounted on the roof of the aircraft fuselage. Simultaneously, the IWC is determined by a cloud particle spectrometer attached under an aircraft wing. Two more examples of simultaneous IWC measurements by hygrometers and cloud spectrometers are presented, but the inlets of the hygrometers were mounted at the fuselage side (M-55 Geophysica, StratoClim campaign 2017) and bottom (NASA WB57, MacPex campaign 2011). This combination of instruments and inlet positions provides the opportunity to experimentally study the influence of the ice particle sampling position on the IWC with the approach of comparative measurements. As expected from theory and shown by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations, we found that the IWCs provided by the roof inlets deviate from those measured under the aircraft wing. As a result of the inlet position in the shadow zone behind the aircraft cockpit, ice particle populations with mean mass sizes larger than about 25µm radius are subject to losses, which lead to strongly underestimated IWCs. On the other hand, cloud populations with mean mass sizes smaller than about 12µm are dominated by particle enrichment and thus overestimated IWCs. In the range of mean mass sizes between 12 and 25µm, both enrichment and losses of ice crystals can occur, depending on whether the ice crystal mass peak of the size distribution – in these cases bimodal – is on the smaller or larger mass mode. The resulting deviations of the IWC reach factors of up to 10 or even more for losses as well as for enrichment. Since the mean mass size of ice crystals increases with temperature, losses are more pronounced at higher temperatures, while at lower temperatures IWC is more affected by enrichment. In contrast, in the cases where the hygrometer inlets were mounted at the fuselage side or bottom, the agreement of IWCs is most frequently within a factor of 2.5 or better – due to less disturbed ice particle sampling, as expected from theory – independently of the mean ice crystal sizes. The rather large scatter between IWC measurements reflects, for example, cirrus cloud inhomogeneities and instrument uncertainties as well as slight sampling biases which might also occur on the side or bottom of the fuselage and under the wing. However, this scatter is in the range of other studies and represent the current best possible IWC recording on fast-flying aircraft.
000852457 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244$$a244 - Composition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and middle atmosphere (POF3-244)$$cPOF3-244$$fPOF III$$x0
000852457 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000852457 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)139013$$aRolf, Christian$$b1
000852457 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)156523$$aCosta, Anja$$b2
000852457 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129155$$aSpelten, Nicole$$b3$$ufzj
000852457 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129145$$aRiese, Martin$$b4$$ufzj
000852457 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBuchholz, Bernhard$$b5
000852457 7001_ $$00000-0002-1394-3097$$aEbert, Volker$$b6
000852457 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHeller, Romy$$b7
000852457 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKaufmann, Stefan$$b8
000852457 7001_ $$00000-0003-0999-4657$$aMinikin, Andreas$$b9
000852457 7001_ $$00000-0001-8925-7731$$aVoigt, Christiane$$b10
000852457 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZöger, Martin$$b11
000852457 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSmith, Jessica$$b12
000852457 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLawson, Paul$$b13
000852457 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLykov, Alexey$$b14
000852457 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKhaykin, Sergey$$b15
000852457 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129131$$aKrämer, Martina$$b16
000852457 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2505596-3$$a10.5194/amt-11-4015-2018$$gVol. 11, no. 7, p. 4015 - 4031$$n7$$p4015 - 4031$$tAtmospheric measurement techniques$$v11$$x1867-8548$$y2018
000852457 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852457/files/invoice_Helmholtz-PUC-2018-38.pdf
000852457 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852457/files/amt-11-4015-2018.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000852457 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852457/files/amt-11-4015-2018.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000852457 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852457/files/invoice_Helmholtz-PUC-2018-38.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000852457 8767_ $$8Helmholtz-PUC-2018-38$$92018-10-01$$d2018-10-11$$eAPC$$jZahlung erfolgt$$pamt-2017-373
000852457 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:852457$$pdnbdelivery$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire
000852457 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129108$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000852457 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)139013$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000852457 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129155$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000852457 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129145$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000852457 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129131$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b16$$kFZJ
000852457 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lAtmosphäre und Klima$$vComposition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and middle atmosphere$$x0
000852457 9141_ $$y2018
000852457 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000852457 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000852457 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000852457 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bATMOS MEAS TECH : 2015
000852457 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000852457 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000852457 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000852457 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000852457 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000852457 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000852457 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000852457 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
000852457 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000852457 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000852457 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013$$kIEK-7$$lStratosphäre$$x0
000852457 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000852457 980__ $$ajournal
000852457 980__ $$aVDB
000852457 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
000852457 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000852457 980__ $$aAPC
000852457 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013