000852504 001__ 852504
000852504 005__ 20240712113237.0
000852504 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.074
000852504 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0360-3199
000852504 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1879-3487
000852504 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/22252
000852504 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000464296600004
000852504 037__ $$aFZJ-2018-05432
000852504 082__ $$a660
000852504 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)172758$$aBender, Guido$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000852504 245__ $$aInitial Approaches in Benchmarking and Round Robin Testing for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers
000852504 260__ $$aNew York, NY [u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2019
000852504 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000852504 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000852504 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1627630437_27194
000852504 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000852504 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000852504 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000852504 520__ $$aAs ever-increasing amounts of renewable electricity enter the energy supply mix on a regional, national and international basis, greater emphasis is being placed on energy conversion and storage technologies to deal with the oscillations, excess and lack of electricity. Hydrogen generation via proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) is one technology that offers a pathway to store large amounts of electricity in the form of hydrogen. The challenges to widespread adoption of PEM water electrolyzers lie in their high capital and operating costs which both need to be reduced through R&D. An evaluation of reported PEMWE performance data in the literature reveals that there are excessive variations of in situ performance results that make it difficult to draw conclusions on the pathway forward to performance optimization and future R&D directions. To enable the meaningful comparison of in situ performance evaluation across laboratories there is an obvious need for standardization of materials and testing protocols. Herein, we address this need by reporting the results of a round robin test effort conducted at the laboratories of five contributors to the IEA Electrolysis Annex 30. For this effort a method and equipment framework were first developed and then verified with respect to its feasibility for measuring water electrolysis performance accurately across the various laboratories. The effort utilized identical sets of test articles, materials, and test cells, and employed a set of shared test protocols. It further defined a minimum skeleton of requirements for the test station equipment. The maximum observed deviation between laboratories at 1 A cm−2 at cell temperatures of 60 °C and 80 °C was 27 and 20 mV, respectively. The deviation of the results from laboratory to laboratory was 2–3 times higher than the lowest deviation observed at one single lab and test station. However, the highest deviations observed were one-tenth of those extracted by a literature survey on similar material sets. The work endorses the urgent need to identify one or more reference sets of materials in addition to the method and equipment framework introduced here, to enable accurate comparison of results across the entire community. The results further imply that cell temperature control appears to be the most significant source of deviation between results, and that care must be taken with respect to break-in conditions and cell electrical connections for meaningful performance data.
000852504 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134$$a134 - Electrolysis and Hydrogen (POF3-134)$$cPOF3-134$$fPOF III$$x0
000852504 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000852504 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145276$$aCarmo, Marcelo$$b1$$ufzj
000852504 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSmolinka, Tom$$b2
000852504 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGago, Aldo$$b3
000852504 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDanilovic, Nemanja$$b4
000852504 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129892$$aMüller, Martin$$b5$$ufzj
000852504 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGanci, Fabrizio$$b6
000852504 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFallisch, Arne$$b7
000852504 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLettenmeier, Philipp$$b8
000852504 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFriedrich, Andreas$$b9
000852504 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAyer, Kathy$$b10
000852504 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPivovar, Brian$$b11
000852504 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129888$$aMergel, Jürgen$$b12
000852504 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129928$$aStolten, Detlef$$b13$$ufzj
000852504 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1484487-4$$a10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.074$$gVol. 44, no. 18, p. 9174 - 9187$$n18$$p9174 - 9187$$tInternational journal of hydrogen energy$$v44$$x0360-3199$$y2019
000852504 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852504/files/qt4816g0q7.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000852504 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852504/files/qt4816g0q7.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000852504 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:852504$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000852504 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145276$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000852504 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129892$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
000852504 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129928$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b13$$kFZJ
000852504 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)36225-6$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129928$$aRWTH Aachen$$b13$$kRWTH
000852504 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lSpeicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen$$vElectrolysis and Hydrogen$$x0
000852504 9141_ $$y2019
000852504 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000852504 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
000852504 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000852504 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bINT J HYDROGEN ENERG : 2015
000852504 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000852504 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000852504 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000852504 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000852504 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000852504 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000852504 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000852504 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000852504 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000852504 920__ $$lyes
000852504 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013$$kIEK-3$$lTechnoökonomische Systemanalyse$$x0
000852504 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129$$kIEK-14$$lElektrochemische Verfahrenstechnik$$x1
000852504 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000852504 980__ $$ajournal
000852504 980__ $$aVDB
000852504 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
000852504 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129
000852504 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000852504 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-2-20101013
000852504 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IET-4-20191129
000852504 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IET-4-20191129