Home > Publications database > Formation of Open Framework Uranium Germanates: The Influence of Mixed Molten Flux and Charge Density Dependence in U-Silicate and U-Germanate Families > print

001     852543
005     20240712084600.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01781
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0020-1669
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1520-510X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a pmid:30125085
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000443923700076
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2018-05463
082 _ _ |a 540
100 1 _ |a Li, Haijian
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168214
|b 0
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Formation of Open Framework Uranium Germanates: The Influence of Mixed Molten Flux and Charge Density Dependence in U-Silicate and U-Germanate Families
260 _ _ |a Washington, DC
|c 2018
|b American Chemical Society
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1538055587_32592
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Seven novel open-framework uranyl germanates, K2(UO2)GeO4, K6(UO2)3Ge8O22, α-Cs2(UO2)Ge2O6, β-Cs2(UO2)Ge2O6, Cs2(UO2)GeO4, and A(UO2)3(Ge2O7)2 (A = [NaK6Cl]6+, [Na2Cs6Cl2]6+), were grown from different mixed molten fluxes. The three-dimensional (3D) structure of K2(UO2)GeO4 with 8-ring channels can be built upon [UGe4] pentamer secondary building units (SBUs). The 3D framework of K6(UO2)3Ge8O22 with trapezoid (Ge8O22)12– clusters consists of two types of [UGe4] pentamers. The 3D framework of α-Cs2(UO2)Ge2O6 with 10-ring channels, crystallizing in the P21/n space group, is constructed by [UGe4] pentamers. The structure of β-Cs2(UO2)Ge2O6 contains achter (eight) single germanate chains and is composed of [UGe6] heptamers and [UGe4] pentamers. The structure of Cs2(UO2)GeO4 with hexagonal 10-ring channels is composed of [U3Ge4] heptamers and twisting five-fold GeO4 tetrahedra in four-membered Ge4O12 rings occur. 3D frameworks of NaK6Cl(UO2)3(Ge2O7)2 (space group Pnnm) and Na2Cs6Cl2(UO2)3(Ge2O7)2 (P21/c) can be constructed from the same SBUs [UGe4] pentamers. Thermal stability of salt-inclusions was studied by TG and PXRD analysis. Analysis of charge density for the U–Si–O system indicates that the polymerization of silicate units reduces the cross-links of the 3D frameworks. The concept of SBUs combined with the cutting and gluing strategy was applied to understand and analyze the distinct 8-, 10-, 12-, and 14- membered channels for the uranyl germanate family. The charge density of all known 3D U–Si/Ge–O frameworks has been investigated, which shows strong correlations with chemical composition of corresponding phases. The increase of Si/O (Ge/O) ratios in silicate units results in the decrease of negative charge density. Moreover, the charge density increases with decreasing countercation size within the same Si/O ratio. The correlations can be used to predict inclusion phase formation within U–Si/Ge–O families. Raman spectra of the studied uranyl germanates were measured, and bands were assigned on the basis of structural features.
536 _ _ |a 161 - Nuclear Waste Management (POF3-161)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-161
|c POF3-161
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |c HGF-YIG-Energy
|x 1
|0 G:(DE-HGF)HGF-YIG-Energy
|a Helmholtz Young Investigators Group: Energy (HGF-YIG-Energy)
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Langer, Eike
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)159447
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Kegler, Philip
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)159378
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Modolo, Giuseppe
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130383
|b 3
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Alekseev, Evgeny
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144426
|b 4
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01781
|g Vol. 57, no. 17, p. 11201 - 11216
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1484438-2
|n 17
|p 11201 - 11216
|t Inorganic chemistry
|v 57
|y 2018
|x 1520-510X
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852543/files/acs.inorgchem.8b01781.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852543/files/acs.inorgchem.8b01781.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:852543
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168214
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)159447
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)159378
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130383
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144426
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Nukleare Entsorgung und Sicherheit sowie Strahlenforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-160
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-161
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Nuclear Waste Management
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b INORG CHEM : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-6-20101013
|k IEK-6
|l Nukleare Entsorgung und Reaktorsicherheit
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-6-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IFN-2-20101013

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21