% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Murchie:852603,
      author       = {Murchie, Erik H and Kefauver, Shawn and Araus, Jose Luis
                      and Muller, Onno and Rascher, Uwe and Flood, Pádraic J and
                      Lawson, Tracy},
      title        = {{M}easuring the dynamic photosynthome},
      journal      = {Annals of botany},
      volume       = {122},
      number       = {2},
      issn         = {1095-8290},
      address      = {Oxford},
      publisher    = {Oxford University Press},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-05507},
      pages        = {207 - 220},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {BackgroundPhotosynthesis underpins plant productivity and
                      yet is notoriously sensitive to small changes in
                      environmental conditions, meaning that quantitation in
                      nature across different time scales is not straightforward.
                      The ‘dynamic’ changes in photosynthesis (i.e. the
                      kinetics of the various reactions of photosynthesis in
                      response to environmental shifts) are now known to be
                      important in driving crop yield.ScopeIt is known that
                      photosynthesis does not respond in a timely manner, and even
                      a small temporal ‘mismatch’ between a change in the
                      environment and the appropriate response of photosynthesis
                      toward optimality can result in a fall in productivity. Yet
                      the most commonly measured parameters are still made at
                      steady state or a temporary steady state (including those
                      for crop breeding purposes), meaning that new photosynthetic
                      traits remain undiscovered.ConclusionsThere is a great need
                      to understand photosynthesis dynamics from a mechanistic and
                      biological viewpoint especially when applied to the field of
                      ‘phenomics’ which typically uses large genetically
                      diverse populations of plants. Despite huge advances in
                      measurement technology in recent years, it is still unclear
                      whether we possess the capability of capturing and
                      describing the physiologically relevant dynamic features of
                      field photosynthesis in sufficient detail. Such traits are
                      highly complex, hence we dub this the ‘photosynthome’.
                      This review sets out the state of play and describes some
                      approaches that could be made to address this challenge with
                      reference to the relevant biological processes involved.},
      cin          = {IBG-2},
      ddc          = {580},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
      pnm          = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:29873681},
      UT           = {WOS:000440977500005},
      doi          = {10.1093/aob/mcy087},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852603},
}