001     852616
005     20220930130158.0
024 7 _ |2 doi
|a 10.1007/s11104-018-3787-2
024 7 _ |2 ISSN
|a 0032-079X
024 7 _ |2 ISSN
|a 1573-5036
024 7 _ |2 Handle
|a 2128/21591
024 7 _ |a WOS:000458270300004
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:48872542
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2018-05520
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)151189
|a Robles-Aguilar, Ana A.
|b 0
245 _ _ |a The effect of pH on morphological and physiological root traits of Lupinus angustifolius treated with struvite as a recycled phosphorus source
260 _ _ |a Dordrecht [u.a.]
|b Springer Science + Business Media B.V
|c 2019
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a article
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Journal article
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|s 1549959518_26321
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
336 7 _ |0 0
|2 EndNote
|a Journal Article
520 _ _ |a Aims: Phosphorus (P) recovery from specific waste streams is necessary to develop environmentally sustainable and efficient fertilizers, achieving maximum productivity with minimum losses. A promising example of a P-recovery product is struvite (MgNH4PO4⋅6H2O). Phosphorus availability from struvite is profoundly influenced by soil pH and/or processes in the rhizosphere. Root exudates (e.g., organic anions) and root morphology affect fertilizer bioavailability. The overall objective of our study was to identify root morphological and physiological traits of the narrow-leaf lupine (Lupinus angustifolius L. subsp. angustifolius, cultivar: blau “Boregine”) involved in the acquisition of P from struvite, compared with KH2PO4 as a soluble P source. The study included different pH conditions, as soil pH is one of the main factors affecting P availability.Methods: Narrow-leaf lupine plants were grown in river sand under three pH conditions (4.5, 6.5 and 7.5). Three different P treatment conditions were used: 1) KH2PO4 (KP); 2) MgNH4PO4⋅6H2O (Struvite), both supplied at 15 μg P g−1 dry sand; and 3) no P addition (Nil-P), as control. Organic acids in the rhizosheath were collected. Root morphological parameters such as specific root length and root diameter were analyzed.Results: There was no significant difference in total plant biomass detected under any pH condition between struvite and KP treatments. In both acidic and alkaline conditions, the P-uptake efficiency (PUE: mg P plant−1/cm2 root surface area) with struvite was significantly greater than with KP. At neutral pH, there was no difference in PUE between plants supplied with KP or struvite. Plants growing at neutral pH showed greater root exudation of carboxylates (mainly citrate) when struvite was added compared with KP. At alkaline pH, the exudation per unit root surface area was greater than that at acidic or neutral pH. Plants growing in acidic pH had a higher specific root length (SRL) compared with those grown at alkaline or neutral pH.Conclusions: Similar P-uptake efficiency from struvite and KH2PO4 at neutral pH in conjunction with the higher total biomass compared to the Nil-P treatment (70% higher) suggests very effective mobilization of P from struvite by carboxylate exudation. Application of struvite, while taking into account the different strategies for nutrient mobilization, can increase the use efficiency of this recovered P source.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|a 582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)
|c POF3-582
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |0 G:(EU-Grant)603744
|a MANUREECOMINE - Green fertilizer upcycling from manure: Technological, economic and environmental sustainability demonstration (603744)
|c 603744
|f FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |0 0000-0002-8127-645X
|a Pang, Jiayin
|b 1
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)144879
|a Postma, Johannes A.
|b 2
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)166424
|a Schrey, Silvia D.
|b 3
700 1 _ |0 0000-0002-4118-2272
|a Lambers, Hans
|b 4
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129475
|a Jablonowski, Nicolai D.
|b 5
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)1478535-3
|a 10.1007/s11104-018-3787-2
|n 1-2
|p 65-78
|t Plant and soil
|v 434
|x 0032-079X
|y 2019
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852616/files/20180926161116748.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852616/files/20180926161116748.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852616/files/Robles-Aguilar2019_Article_TheEffectOfPHOnMorphologicalAn.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852616/files/Robles-Aguilar2019_Article_TheEffectOfPHOnMorphologicalAn.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:852616
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p ec_fundedresources
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)151189
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 0
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|6 0000-0002-8127-645X
|a External Institute
|b 1
|k Extern
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|6 0000-0002-8127-645X
|a School of Agriculture and Environment, and the UWA Institute of Agriculture, TheUniversity ofWestern Australia, Perth,WA6001, Australia
|b 1
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144879
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 2
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)166424
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 3
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|6 0000-0002-4118-2272
|a External Institute
|b 4
|k Extern
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|6 0000-0002-4118-2272
|a School of Biological Sciences, and Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6001, Australia
|b 4
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129475
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 5
|k FZJ
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|v Plant Science
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
|a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|a JCR
|b PLANT SOIL : 2015
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|a IF < 5
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
|a OpenAccess
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|a Peer Review
|b ASC
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
|a National-Konsortium
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Medline
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|a Nationallizenz
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21