% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Mrker:852636,
      author       = {Märker, Carolin and Venghaus, Sandra and Hake,
                      Jürgen-Fr.},
      title        = {{I}ntegrated governance for the food–energy–water nexus
                      – {T}he scope of action for institutional change},
      journal      = {Renewable $\&$ sustainable energy reviews},
      volume       = {97},
      issn         = {1364-0321},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-05533},
      pages        = {290-300},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {Despite a major, policy-driven increase in research on the
                      food–energy–water (FEW) nexus in recent years, research
                      addressing the required changes in policy structures and
                      processes for an effective, integrated governance of FEW
                      nexus resources is still in its infancy. This paper adapts
                      the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework to the
                      requirements and challenges of FEW nexus governance and sets
                      a special focus on action situations, actors, and
                      institutions. The analysis thus contributes to the debate
                      about the practicality and benefits of a comprehensive FEW
                      nexus policy approach. Two different conceptual FEW nexus
                      frameworks are developed, which span the spectrum of
                      possible integration options. The first one describes a
                      holistic integration framework that defines the FEW nexus as
                      a single, fully integrated system. The second one represents
                      vertical policy integration and is largely based on existing
                      structures and a reframing of the present institutional
                      setting. After their theoretical derivation, the two
                      hypothetical frameworks are analyzed with respect to their
                      strengths and weaknesses in governing the FEW nexus using
                      two sample cases of integrated FEW nexus governance in
                      Germany. The results show that effective FEW nexus
                      governance requires a combination of both integration
                      options.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000448248600021},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.020},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852636},
}