001     852670
005     20210129235153.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1029/2018WR023159
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0043-1397
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0148-0227
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1944-7973
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/19834
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000448088100059
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2018-05543
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Quade, Maria
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)167345
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Investigation of Kinetic Isotopic Fractionation of Water During Bare Soil Evaporation
260 _ _ |a [New York]
|c 2018
|b Wiley
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1569489946_25778
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The kinetic fractionation factor (αK) controls to a large extent the isotopic enrichment of surface waters during evaporation (E). In contrast to the well-known vapor-to-liquid isotopic equilibrium fractionation factor, αK has still not yet been properly characterized for soil water evaporation. In this study, we investigated the αK daily dynamics during a series of three laboratory experiments differing in soil water availability and aerodynamic conditions. For this, we applied a commonly-used isotopic evaporation model and tested it in two different approaches. First, a two-end member mixing model (“Keeling plot”) was fitted to the measured isotopic composition of the laboratory air water vapor to obtain αK. In a second approach, αK was obtained from the slope of the “evaporation line” in a dual isotopic coordinate system. For both methods, the isotopic composition of the soil water was determined non-destructively and online by sampling the soil water vapor with gas-permeable microporous tubing. Results highlighted the limitation of the first approach, as the determination of the isotopic composition of E with the Keeling plot was challenging with the laboratory setup. The second approach provided αK values within the range (α_K^(2_H ) = 1.0132 ±0.0013; α_K^(〖18〗_O ) = 1.0149 ±0.0012) reported in the literature and pointed to the prevalence of turbulent water vapor transport under water-saturated soil conditions, but also at soil water content significantly lower than the saturated value. In a third experiment, temporal dynamics of the atmospheric water vapor intrusion in the topmost soil layer could be observed during an isotopic labeling pulse.
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |a IDAS-GHG - Instrumental and Data-driven Approaches to Source-Partitioning of Greenhouse Gas Fluxes: Comparison, Combination, Advancement (BMBF-01LN1313A)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)BMBF-01LN1313A
|c BMBF-01LN1313A
|f Nachwuchsgruppen Globaler Wandel 4+1
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Brüggemann, Nicolas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)142357
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Graf, Alexander
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129461
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Vanderborght, Jan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129548
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Vereecken, Harry
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129549
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Rothfuss, Youri
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145658
|b 5
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1029/2018WR023159
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2029553-4
|n 9
|p 6909-6928
|t Water resources research
|v 54
|y 2018
|x 0043-1397
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852670/files/Quade_et_al-2018-Water_Resources_Research.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852670/files/Quade_et_al-2018-Water_Resources_Research.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852670/files/manuscript_alphaK_revised_final.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/852670/files/manuscript_alphaK_revised_final.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:852670
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)167345
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)142357
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129461
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129548
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129549
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145658
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b WATER RESOUR RES : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21