% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Senbayram:857125,
author = {Senbayram, Mehmet and Well, Reinhard and Bol, Roland and
Chadwick, David R. and Jones, David L. and Wu, Di},
title = {{I}nteraction of straw amendment and soil {NO}3− content
controls fungal denitrification and denitrification product
stoichiometry in a sandy soil},
journal = {Soil biology $\&$ biochemistry},
volume = {126},
issn = {0038-0717},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-06369},
pages = {204 - 212},
year = {2018},
abstract = {The return of agricultural crop residues are vital to
maintain or even enhance soil fertility. However, the
influence of application rate of crop residues on
denitrification and its related gaseous N emissions is not
fully understood. We conducted a fully robotized continuous
flow incubation experiment using a Helium/Oxygen atmosphere
over 30 days to examine the effect of maize straw
application rate on: i) the rate of denitrification, ii)
denitrification product stoichiometry N2O/(N2O+N2), and iii)
the contribution of fungal denitrification to N2O fluxes.
Five treatments were established using sieved, repacked
sandy textured soil; i) non-amended control, ii) nitrate
only, iii) low rate of straw + nitrate, iv) medium rate of
straw + nitrate, and iv) high rate of straw + nitrate (n =
3). We simultaneously measured NO, N2O as well as direct N2
emissions and used the N2O 15N site preference signatures of
soil-emitted N2O to distinguish N2O production from fungal
and bacterial denitrification. Uniquely, soil NO3−
measurements were also made throughout the incubation.
Emissions of N2O during the initial phase of the experiment
(0–13 days) increased almost linearly with increasing rate
of straw incorporation and with (almost) no N2 production.
However, the rate of straw amendment was negatively
correlated with N2O, but positively correlated with N2
fluxes later in the experimental period (13–30 days). Soil
NO3− content, in all treatments, was identified as the
main factor responsible for the shift from N2O production to
N2O reduction. Straw amendment immediately lowered the
proportion of N2O from bacterial denitrification, thus
implying that more of the N2O emitted was derived from fungi
$(18 ± 0.7\%$ in control and up to $40 ± 3.0\%$ in
high straw treatments during the first 13 days). However,
after day 15 when soil NO3− content decreased to <40 mg
NO3−-N kg−1 soil, the N2O 15N site preference values of
the N2O produced in the medium straw rate treatment showed a
sharp declining trend 15 days after onset of experiment
thereby indicating a clear shift towards a more dominant
bacterial source of N2O. Our study singularly highlights the
complex interrelationship between soil NO3− kinetics, crop
residue incorporation, fungal denitrification and N2O/(N2O +
N2) ratio. Overall we found that the effect of crop residue
applications on soil N2O and N2 emissions depends mainly on
soil NO3− content, as NO3− was the primary regulator of
the N2O/(N2O + N2) product ratio of denitrification.
Furthermore, the application of straw residue enhanced
fungal denitrification, but only when the soil NO3−
content was sufficient to supply enough electron acceptors
to the denitrifiers.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {540},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000447580800023},
doi = {10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.09.005},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/857125},
}