000857147 001__ 857147
000857147 005__ 20210129235510.0
000857147 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.12.027
000857147 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0306-4522
000857147 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1873-7544
000857147 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:29294336
000857147 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000425876200039
000857147 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:31257710
000857147 037__ $$aFZJ-2018-06391
000857147 082__ $$a610
000857147 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aNackaerts, Evelien$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000857147 245__ $$aBeing on Target: Visual Information during Writing Affects Effective Connectivity in Parkinson’s Disease
000857147 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2018
000857147 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000857147 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000857147 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1542115506_11588
000857147 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000857147 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000857147 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000857147 520__ $$aA common motor symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is micrographia, characterized by a decrease in writing amplitude. Despite the relevance of this impairment for activities of daily living, the underlying neural network abnormalities and the impact of cueing strategies on brain connectivity are unknown. Therefore, we investigated the effects of visual cues on visuomotor network interactions during handwriting in PD and healthy controls (HCs). Twenty-eight patients with early disease, ON dopaminergic medication, and 14 age-matched controls performed a pre-writing task with and without visual cues in the scanner. Patients displayed weaker right visuo-parietal coupling than controls, suggesting impaired visuomotor integration during writing. Surprisingly, cueing did not have the expected positive effects on writing performance. Patients and controls, however, did activate similar networks during cued and uncued writing. During cued writing, the stronger influence of both visual and motor areas on the left superior parietal lobe suggested that visual cueing induced greater visual steering. In the absence of cues, there was enhanced coupling between parietal and supplementary motor areas (SMA) in line with previous findings in HCs during uncued motor tasks. In conclusion, the present study showed that patients with PD, despite their compromised brain function, were able to shift neural networks similar to controls. However, it seemed that visual cues provided a greater accuracy constraint on handwriting rather than offering unequivocal beneficial effects. Altogether, the results suggest that the effectiveness of using compensatory neural networks through applying external stimuli is task dependent and may compromise motor control during writing.
000857147 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$a572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)$$cPOF3-572$$fPOF III$$x0
000857147 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000857147 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMichely, Jochen$$b1
000857147 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHeremans, Elke$$b2
000857147 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSwinnen, Stephan$$b3
000857147 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSmits-Engelsman, Bouwien$$b4
000857147 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aVandenberghe, Wim$$b5
000857147 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)161406$$aGrefkes, Christian$$b6
000857147 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aNieuwboer, Alice$$b7
000857147 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1498423-4$$a10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.12.027$$gVol. 371, p. 484 - 494$$p484 - 494$$tNeuroscience$$v371$$x0306-4522$$y2018
000857147 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/857147/files/1-s2.0-S030645221730917X-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000857147 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/857147/files/1-s2.0-S030645221730917X-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000857147 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:857147$$pVDB
000857147 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)161406$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
000857147 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x0
000857147 9141_ $$y2018
000857147 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000857147 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000857147 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000857147 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bNEUROSCIENCE : 2017
000857147 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000857147 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000857147 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000857147 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000857147 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000857147 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000857147 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000857147 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000857147 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000857147 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000857147 920__ $$lyes
000857147 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000857147 980__ $$ajournal
000857147 980__ $$aVDB
000857147 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000857147 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED