% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Holtstiege:857798,
author = {Holtstiege, Florian and Koç, Tuncay and Hundehege, Tobias
and Siozios, Vassilios and Winter, Martin and Placke,
Tobias},
title = {{T}oward {H}igh {P}ower {B}atteries: {P}re-lithiated
{C}arbon {N}anospheres as {H}igh {R}ate {A}node {M}aterial
for {L}ithium {I}on {B}atteries},
journal = {ACS applied energy materials},
volume = {1},
number = {8},
issn = {2574-0962},
address = {Washington, DC},
publisher = {ACS Publications},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-06765},
pages = {4321 - 4331},
year = {2018},
abstract = {In this work, carbon nanospheres (CS) are prepared by
hydrothermal synthesis using glucose as precursor, followed
by a subsequent carbonization step. By variation of the
synthesis parameters, CS particles with different particle
sizes are obtained. With particular focus on the fast
charging capability, the electrochemical performance of CS
as anode material in lithium ion batteries (LIBs) is
investigated, including the influence of particle size and
carbonization temperature. It is shown that CS possess an
extraordinary good long-term cycling stability and a very
good rate capability (up to 20C charge/discharge rate) at
operating temperatures of 20 and 0 °C compared to graphitic
carbon and Li4Ti5O12 (LTO)-based anodes. One major
disadvantage of CS is the very low first cycle Coulombic
efficiency (Ceff) and the related high active lithium loss,
which prevents usage of CS within LIB full cells.
Nevertheless, in order to overcome this problem, we
performed electrochemical pre-lithiation, which
significantly improves the first cycle Ceff and enables
usage of CS within LIB full cells (vs NMC-111), which is
shown here for the first time. The improved rate capability
of CS is also verified in electrochemically pre-lithiated
NMC-based LIB full cells, in comparison to graphite and LTO
anodes. Further, CS also display an improved specific energy
(at ≥5C), energy efficiency (at ≥2C), and energy
retention (at ≥2C) compared to graphite and LTO-based LIB
full cells.},
cin = {IEK-12},
ddc = {540},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217},
pnm = {131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000458706400092},
doi = {10.1021/acsaem.8b00945},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/857798},
}