% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Klosterhalfen:857929,
author = {Klosterhalfen, Anne and Moene, A. F. and Schmidt, Marius
and Scanlon, T. M. and Vereecken, Harry and Graf, Alexander},
title = {{S}ensitivity analysis of a source partitioning method for
{H}$_2${O} and {CO}$_2$ fluxes based on high frequency eddy
covariance data: {F}indings from field data and large eddy
simulations},
journal = {Agricultural and forest meteorology},
volume = {265},
issn = {0168-1923},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-06883},
pages = {152 - 170},
year = {2019},
note = {Netherlands Science Foundation under contract NWO 15774},
abstract = {Scanlon and Sahu (2008) and Scanlon and Kustas (2010)
proposed a source partitioning method (SK10 in the
following) to estimate contributions of transpiration,
evaporation, photosynthesis, and respiration to H$_2$O and
CO$_2$ fluxes obtained by the eddy covariance method. High
frequency eddy covariance raw data time series are needed,
and the source partitioning is estimated based on separate
application of the flux-variance similarity theory to
stomatal and non-stomatal components of the regarded fluxes,
as well as on additional assumptions on leaf-level water use
efficiency (WUE).\\We applied SK10 to data from two test
sites (forest and cropland) and analyzed partitioning
results depending on various ways to estimate WUE from
available data. Also, we conducted large eddy simulations
(LES), simulating the turbulent transport of H$_2$O and
CO$_2$ for contrasting vertical distributions of the canopy
sinks/sources, as well as for varying relative magnitudes of
soil sources and canopy sinks/sources. SK10 was applied to
the synthetic high frequency data generated by LES and the
effects of canopy type, measurement height, given
sink-source-distributions, and input of varying WUEs were
tested regarding the partitioning performance. SK10 requires
that the correlation coefficient between stomatal and
non-stomatal scalar fluctuations is determined by the ratio
of the transfer efficiencies of these scalar components, an
assumption (transfer assumption in the following) that could
be tested with the generated LES data.\\The partitioning
results of the field sites yielded satisfactory flux
fractions, when fair-weather conditions (no precipitation)
and a high productive state of the vegetation were present.
Further, partitioning performance with regard to soil fluxes
increased with crop maturity. Results also showed relatively
large dependencies on WUE, where the partitioning factors
(median) changed by around -57\% and +36\%. Measurements of
outgoing longwave radiation used for the estimation of
foliage temperature and WUE could slightly increase the
plausibility of the partitioning results in comparison to
soil respiration measurements by decreasing the partitioning
factor by up to 42\%. The LES-based analysis revealed that
for a satisfying performance of SK10, a certain degree of
decorrelation of the H$_2$O and CO$_2$ fluctuations (here,
|ρ$_{q’c’}$| < 0.975) was needed. This decorrelation is
enhanced by a clear separation between soil sources and
canopy sinks/sources, and for observations within the
roughness sublayer. The expected dependence of the
partitioning results on the WUE input could be observed.
However, due to violation of the abovementioned transfer
assumption, the known true input WUE did not yield the known
true input partitioning. This could only be achieved after
introducing correction factors for the transfer assumption,
which were known however only in the special case of the LES
experiments.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255) / IDAS-GHG - Instrumental and Data-driven
Approaches to Source-Partitioning of Greenhouse Gas Fluxes:
Comparison, Combination, Advancement (BMBF-01LN1313A)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 / G:(DE-Juel1)BMBF-01LN1313A},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000456751200014},
doi = {10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.11.003},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/857929},
}