001     857929
005     20210129235800.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.11.003
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0168-1923
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1873-2240
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/20265
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000456751200014
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2018-06883
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Klosterhalfen, Anne
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)159313
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Sensitivity analysis of a source partitioning method for H$_2$O and CO$_2$ fluxes based on high frequency eddy covariance data: Findings from field data and large eddy simulations
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2019
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1543826064_9829
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a Netherlands Science Foundation under contract NWO 15774
520 _ _ |a Scanlon and Sahu (2008) and Scanlon and Kustas (2010) proposed a source partitioning method (SK10 in the following) to estimate contributions of transpiration, evaporation, photosynthesis, and respiration to H$_2$O and CO$_2$ fluxes obtained by the eddy covariance method. High frequency eddy covariance raw data time series are needed, and the source partitioning is estimated based on separate application of the flux-variance similarity theory to stomatal and non-stomatal components of the regarded fluxes, as well as on additional assumptions on leaf-level water use efficiency (WUE).\\We applied SK10 to data from two test sites (forest and cropland) and analyzed partitioning results depending on various ways to estimate WUE from available data. Also, we conducted large eddy simulations (LES), simulating the turbulent transport of H$_2$O and CO$_2$ for contrasting vertical distributions of the canopy sinks/sources, as well as for varying relative magnitudes of soil sources and canopy sinks/sources. SK10 was applied to the synthetic high frequency data generated by LES and the effects of canopy type, measurement height, given sink-source-distributions, and input of varying WUEs were tested regarding the partitioning performance. SK10 requires that the correlation coefficient between stomatal and non-stomatal scalar fluctuations is determined by the ratio of the transfer efficiencies of these scalar components, an assumption (transfer assumption in the following) that could be tested with the generated LES data.\\The partitioning results of the field sites yielded satisfactory flux fractions, when fair-weather conditions (no precipitation) and a high productive state of the vegetation were present. Further, partitioning performance with regard to soil fluxes increased with crop maturity. Results also showed relatively large dependencies on WUE, where the partitioning factors (median) changed by around -57% and +36%. Measurements of outgoing longwave radiation used for the estimation of foliage temperature and WUE could slightly increase the plausibility of the partitioning results in comparison to soil respiration measurements by decreasing the partitioning factor by up to 42%. The LES-based analysis revealed that for a satisfying performance of SK10, a certain degree of decorrelation of the H$_2$O and CO$_2$ fluctuations (here, |ρ$_{q’c’}$| < 0.975) was needed. This decorrelation is enhanced by a clear separation between soil sources and canopy sinks/sources, and for observations within the roughness sublayer. The expected dependence of the partitioning results on the WUE input could be observed. However, due to violation of the abovementioned transfer assumption, the known true input WUE did not yield the known true input partitioning. This could only be achieved after introducing correction factors for the transfer assumption, which were known however only in the special case of the LES experiments.
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |a IDAS-GHG - Instrumental and Data-driven Approaches to Source-Partitioning of Greenhouse Gas Fluxes: Comparison, Combination, Advancement (BMBF-01LN1313A)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)BMBF-01LN1313A
|c BMBF-01LN1313A
|f Nachwuchsgruppen Globaler Wandel 4+1
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Moene, A. F.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Schmidt, Marius
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144420
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Scanlon, T. M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Vereecken, Harry
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129549
|b 4
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Graf, Alexander
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129461
|b 5
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.11.003
|g Vol. 265, p. 152 - 170
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2012165-9
|p 152 - 170
|t Agricultural and forest meteorology
|v 265
|y 2019
|x 0168-1923
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/857929/files/1-s2.0-S0168192318303496-main.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |y Published on 2019-02-15. Available in OpenAccess from 2021-02-15.
|z StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/857929/files/Post-Print.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/857929/files/Supplementary%20Material.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |y Published on 2019-02-15. Available in OpenAccess from 2021-02-15.
|x pdfa
|z StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/857929/files/Post-Print.pdf?subformat=pdfa
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/857929/files/Supplementary%20Material.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/857929/files/1-s2.0-S0168192318303496-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:857929
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)159313
910 1 _ |a Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144420
910 1 _ |a Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, United States
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129549
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129461
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b AGR FOREST METEOROL : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21