000858068 001__ 858068
000858068 005__ 20210129235827.0
000858068 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1371/journal.pone.0208177
000858068 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/20282
000858068 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:30500854
000858068 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000451883700027
000858068 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:52262322
000858068 037__ $$aFZJ-2018-06986
000858068 082__ $$a610
000858068 1001_ $$00000-0002-3150-5576$$aAcar, Freya$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000858068 245__ $$aAssessing robustness against potential publication bias in Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses for fMRI
000858068 260__ $$aSan Francisco, California, US$$bPLOS$$c2018
000858068 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000858068 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000858068 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1543995067_1274
000858068 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000858068 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000858068 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000858068 500__ $$aFA, RS and BM would like to acknowledge the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) for financial support (Grant G.0149.14N).SBE was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH074457), the Helmholtz Portfolio Theme "Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain" and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 7202070 (HBP SGA1).
000858068 520__ $$aThe importance of integrating research findings is incontrovertible and procedures for coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA) such as Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) have become a popular approach to combine results of fMRI studies when only peaks of activation are reported. As meta-analytical findings help building cumulative knowledge and guide future research, not only the quality of such analyses but also the way conclusions are drawn is extremely important. Like classical meta-analyses, coordinate-based meta-analyses can be subject to different forms of publication bias which may impact results and invalidate findings. The file drawer problem refers to the problem where studies fail to get published because they do not obtain anticipated results (e.g. due to lack of statistical significance). To enable assessing the stability of meta-analytical results and determine their robustness against the potential presence of the file drawer problem, we present an algorithm to determine the number of noise studies that can be added to an existing ALE fMRI meta-analysis before spatial convergence of reported activation peaks over studies in specific regions is no longer statistically significant. While methods to gain insight into the validity and limitations of results exist for other coordinate-based meta-analysis toolboxes, such as Galbraith plots for Multilevel Kernel Density Analysis (MKDA) and funnel plots and egger tests for seed-based d mapping, this procedure is the first to assess robustness against potential publication bias for the ALE algorithm. The method assists in interpreting meta-analytical results with the appropriate caution by looking how stable results remain in the presence of unreported information that may differ systematically from the information that is included. At the same time, the procedure provides further insight into the number of studies that drive the meta-analytical results. We illustrate the procedure through an example and test the effect of several parameters through extensive simulations. Code to generate noise studies is made freely available which enables users to easily use the algorithm when interpreting their results
000858068 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574$$a574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574)$$cPOF3-574$$fPOF III$$x0
000858068 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)HGF-SMHB-2013-2017$$aSMHB - Supercomputing and Modelling for the Human Brain (HGF-SMHB-2013-2017)$$cHGF-SMHB-2013-2017$$fSMHB$$x1
000858068 536__ $$0G:(EU-Grant)720270$$aHBP SGA1 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 1 (720270)$$c720270$$fH2020-Adhoc-2014-20$$x2
000858068 536__ $$0G:(EU-Grant)785907$$aHBP SGA2 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 2 (785907)$$c785907$$fH2020-SGA-FETFLAG-HBP-2017$$x3
000858068 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000858068 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSeurinck, Ruth$$b1
000858068 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aEickhoff, Simon$$b2$$ufzj
000858068 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMoerkerke, Beatrijs$$b3
000858068 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2267670-3$$a10.1371/journal.pone.0208177$$gVol. 13, no. 11, p. e0208177 -$$n11$$p-$$tPLOS ONE$$v13$$x1932-6203$$y2018
000858068 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/858068/files/Acar18.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000858068 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/858068/files/Acar18.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000858068 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:858068$$pdnbdelivery$$pec_fundedresources$$pVDB$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000858068 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000858068 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$vTheory, modelling and simulation$$x0
000858068 9141_ $$y2018
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000858068 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bPLOS ONE : 2017
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central
000858068 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000858068 920__ $$lyes
000858068 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
000858068 980__ $$ajournal
000858068 980__ $$aVDB
000858068 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000858068 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
000858068 9801_ $$aFullTexts