guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Assessing robustness against potential publication bias in Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses for fMRI > print |
| Home > Publications database > Assessing robustness against potential publication bias in Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses for fMRI > print |
| 001 | 858068 | ||
| 005 | 20210129235827.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0208177 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/20282 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:30500854 |2 pmid |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000451883700027 |2 WOS |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:52262322 |2 altmetric |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2018-06986 |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Acar, Freya |0 0000-0002-3150-5576 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Assessing robustness against potential publication bias in Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses for fMRI |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a San Francisco, California, US |c 2018 |b PLOS |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1543995067_1274 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 500 | _ | _ | |a FA, RS and BM would like to acknowledge the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) for financial support (Grant G.0149.14N).SBE was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH074457), the Helmholtz Portfolio Theme "Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain" and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 7202070 (HBP SGA1). |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a The importance of integrating research findings is incontrovertible and procedures for coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA) such as Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) have become a popular approach to combine results of fMRI studies when only peaks of activation are reported. As meta-analytical findings help building cumulative knowledge and guide future research, not only the quality of such analyses but also the way conclusions are drawn is extremely important. Like classical meta-analyses, coordinate-based meta-analyses can be subject to different forms of publication bias which may impact results and invalidate findings. The file drawer problem refers to the problem where studies fail to get published because they do not obtain anticipated results (e.g. due to lack of statistical significance). To enable assessing the stability of meta-analytical results and determine their robustness against the potential presence of the file drawer problem, we present an algorithm to determine the number of noise studies that can be added to an existing ALE fMRI meta-analysis before spatial convergence of reported activation peaks over studies in specific regions is no longer statistically significant. While methods to gain insight into the validity and limitations of results exist for other coordinate-based meta-analysis toolboxes, such as Galbraith plots for Multilevel Kernel Density Analysis (MKDA) and funnel plots and egger tests for seed-based d mapping, this procedure is the first to assess robustness against potential publication bias for the ALE algorithm. The method assists in interpreting meta-analytical results with the appropriate caution by looking how stable results remain in the presence of unreported information that may differ systematically from the information that is included. At the same time, the procedure provides further insight into the number of studies that drive the meta-analytical results. We illustrate the procedure through an example and test the effect of several parameters through extensive simulations. Code to generate noise studies is made freely available which enables users to easily use the algorithm when interpreting their results |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574 |c POF3-574 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a SMHB - Supercomputing and Modelling for the Human Brain (HGF-SMHB-2013-2017) |0 G:(DE-Juel1)HGF-SMHB-2013-2017 |c HGF-SMHB-2013-2017 |f SMHB |x 1 |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a HBP SGA1 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 1 (720270) |0 G:(EU-Grant)720270 |c 720270 |f H2020-Adhoc-2014-20 |x 2 |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a HBP SGA2 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 2 (785907) |0 G:(EU-Grant)785907 |c 785907 |f H2020-SGA-FETFLAG-HBP-2017 |x 3 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Seurinck, Ruth |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Eickhoff, Simon |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131678 |b 2 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Moerkerke, Beatrijs |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0208177 |g Vol. 13, no. 11, p. e0208177 - |0 PERI:(DE-600)2267670-3 |n 11 |p - |t PLOS ONE |v 13 |y 2018 |x 1932-6203 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/858068/files/Acar18.pdf |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x pdfa |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/858068/files/Acar18.pdf?subformat=pdfa |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:858068 |p openaire |p open_access |p driver |p VDB |p ec_fundedresources |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Decoding the Human Brain |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500 |v Theory, modelling and simulation |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2018 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040 |2 StatID |b Zoological Record |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b PLOS ONE : 2017 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310 |2 StatID |b NCBI Molecular Biology Database |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320 |2 StatID |b PubMed Central |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 |k INM-7 |l Gehirn & Verhalten |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|