| 001 | 858247 | ||
| 005 | 20240313103111.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.3389/fninf.2018.00081 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/20351 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:30534066 |2 pmid |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000451351200001 |2 WOS |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:51749979 |2 altmetric |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2018-07146 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Trensch, Guido |0 P:(DE-Juel1)168379 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |u fzj |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Rigorous Neural Network Simulations: A Model Substantiation Methodology for Increasing the Correctness of Simulation Results in the Absence of Experimental Validation Data |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Lausanne |c 2018 |b Frontiers Research Foundation |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1563261639_618 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a The reproduction and replication of scientific results is an indispensable aspect of good scientific practice, enabling previous studies to be built upon and increasing our level of confidence in them. However, reproducibility and replicability are not sufficient: an incorrect result will be accurately reproduced if the same incorrect methods are used. For the field of simulations of complex neural networks, the causes of incorrect results vary from insufficient model implementations and data analysis methods, deficiencies in workmanship (e.g., simulation planning, setup, and execution) to errors induced by hardware constraints (e.g., limitations in numerical precision). In order to build credibility, methods such as verification and validation have been developed, but they are not yet well-established in the field of neural network modeling and simulation, partly due to ambiguity concerning the terminology. In this manuscript, we propose a terminology for model verification and validation in the field of neural network modeling and simulation. We outline a rigorous workflow derived from model verification and validation methodologies for increasing model credibility when it is not possible to validate against experimental data. We compare a published minimal spiking network model capable of exhibiting the development of polychronous groups, to its reproduction on the SpiNNaker neuromorphic system, where we consider the dynamics of several selected network states. As a result, by following a formalized process, we show that numerical accuracy is critically important, and even small deviations in the dynamics of individual neurons are expressed in the dynamics at network level. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574 |c POF3-574 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 511 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods (POF3-511) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511 |c POF3-511 |f POF III |x 1 |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a HBP SGA1 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 1 (720270) |0 G:(EU-Grant)720270 |c 720270 |f H2020-Adhoc-2014-20 |x 2 |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a HBP SGA2 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 2 (785907) |0 G:(EU-Grant)785907 |c 785907 |f H2020-SGA-FETFLAG-HBP-2017 |x 3 |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a SLNS - SimLab Neuroscience (Helmholtz-SLNS) |0 G:(DE-Juel1)Helmholtz-SLNS |c Helmholtz-SLNS |x 4 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Gutzen, Robin |0 P:(DE-Juel1)171572 |b 1 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Blundell, Inga |0 P:(DE-Juel1)166002 |b 2 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Denker, Michael |0 P:(DE-Juel1)144807 |b 3 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Morrison, Abigail |0 P:(DE-Juel1)151166 |b 4 |u fzj |
| 770 | _ | _ | |a Reproducibility and Rigour in Computational Neuroscience |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.3389/fninf.2018.00081 |g Vol. 12, p. 81 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2452979-5 |p 81 |t Frontiers in neuroinformatics |v 12 |y 2018 |x 1662-5196 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/858247/files/2018-0124865-3.pdf |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/858247/files/2018-0124865-3.pdf?subformat=pdfa |x pdfa |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/858247/files/Trensch%20et%20al%20-%20Rigorous%20Neural%20Network%20Simulations%3A%20A%20Model%20Substantiation%20Methodology%20for%20Increasing%20the%20Correctness%20of%20Simulation%20Results%20in%20the%20Absence%20of%20Experimental%20Validation%20Data.pdf |y OpenAccess |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/858247/files/Trensch%20et%20al%20-%20Rigorous%20Neural%20Network%20Simulations%3A%20A%20Model%20Substantiation%20Methodology%20for%20Increasing%20the%20Correctness%20of%20Simulation%20Results%20in%20the%20Absence%20of%20Experimental%20Validation%20Data.pdf?subformat=pdfa |x pdfa |y OpenAccess |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:858247 |p openaire |p open_access |p OpenAPC |p driver |p VDB |p ec_fundedresources |p openCost |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)168379 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)171572 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)166002 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 3 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)144807 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)151166 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Decoding the Human Brain |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500 |v Theory, modelling and simulation |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-510 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500 |v Computational Science and Mathematical Methods |x 1 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |l Supercomputing & Big Data |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2018 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b FRONT NEUROINFORM : 2017 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b DOAJ : Blind peer review |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320 |2 StatID |b PubMed Central |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406 |k JSC |l Jülich Supercomputing Center |x 0 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406 |k INM-6 |l Computational and Systems Neuroscience |x 1 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828 |k IAS-6 |l Theoretical Neuroscience |x 2 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113 |k INM-10 |l Jara-Institut Brain structure-function relationships |x 3 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a APC |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a APC |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 981 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828 |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|
Gast ::