% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Sullivan:858440,
      author       = {Sullivan, Sylvia C. and Barthlott, Christian and Crosier,
                      Jonathan and Zhukov, Ilya and Nenes, Athanasios and Hoose,
                      Corinna},
      title        = {{T}he effect of secondary ice production parameterization
                      on the simulation of a cold frontal rainband},
      journal      = {Atmospheric chemistry and physics},
      volume       = {18},
      issn         = {1680-7316},
      address      = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
      publisher    = {EGU},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-07321},
      pages        = {16461-16480},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {Secondary ice production via processes like rime
                      splintering, frozen droplet shattering, and breakup upon ice
                      hydrometeor collision have been proposed to explain
                      discrepancies between in-cloud ice crystal and
                      ice-nucleating particle numbers. To understand the impact of
                      this additional ice crystal generation on surface
                      precipitation, we present one of the first studies to
                      implement frozen droplet shattering and ice–ice
                      collisional breakup parameterizations in a mesoscale model.
                      We simulate a cold frontal rainband from the Aerosol
                      Properties, PRocesses, And InfluenceS on the Earth's Climate
                      campaign and investigate the impact of the new
                      parameterizations on the simulated ice crystal number
                      concentrations (ICNC) and precipitation. Near the convective
                      regions of the rainband, contributions to ICNC can be as
                      large from secondary production as from primary nucleation,
                      but ICNCs greater than 50L−1 remain underestimated by the
                      model. The addition of the secondary production
                      parameterizations also clearly intensifies the differences
                      in both accumulated precipitation and precipitation rate
                      between the convective towers and non-convective gap
                      regions. We suggest, then, that secondary ice production
                      parameterizations be included in large-scale models on the
                      basis of large hydrometeor concentration and convective
                      activity criteria.},
      cin          = {JSC},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406},
      pnm          = {511 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods
                      (POF3-511)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000450808500001},
      doi          = {10.5194/acp-18-16461-2018},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/858440},
}