% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Wiegand:858834,
author = {Wiegand, Simone and Niether, Doreen},
title = {{INFLUENCE} {OF} {THE} {HYDROPHOBIC}/{HYDROPHILIC}
{INTERPLAY} {ON} {THERMODIFFUSION}},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-07674},
year = {2018},
abstract = {The hydration of hydrophobic solutes remains still illusive
despite the long history of research. Often hydrophobic
hydration is explained in terms of a balance between the
loss in entropy due to cavity formation to accommodate the
hydrophobic molecule and the gain in enthalpy due to
attraction between the solute and solvent molecules [1].
This entropic-enthalpic compensation mechanism is often
found in the context of biochemical reactions and apparently
thermodiffusion is especially sensitive to this balance. We
take a closer look into the mechanism by studying
systematically hydrophilic and more hydrophobic small
molecules as function of temperature and concentration. We
elucidate the often found typical temperature dependence of
the Soret coefficient of solute molecules in water and
relate the empirical parameters with the number and the
strength of hydrogen bonds [2]. Using a linear correlation
between those parameters, we are able to reduce the number
of adjustable parameters to two. We observe a clear
correlation of the temperature and concentration dependence
of the Soret coefficient with the hydrophilicity, which can
be quantitatively described by the logarithm of the
1-octanol/water partition coefficient P, which is a measure
for the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity balance of a solute
for numerous systems [3]. It is often used to model the
transport of a compound in the environment or to screen for
potential pharmaceutical compounds. We give an intuitive
picture explaining the correlation between log P and the
temperature sensitivity of the Soret coefficient. Finally we
discuss a route for a more sophisticated hydrophilicity
scale. REFERENCES[1] S. Liese et al., ACS Nano, 11 702
(2017).[2] Niether, D., et al., Langmuir, 33, 8483(2017).[3]
Niether, D., et al., Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics,
20, 1012(2018).},
month = {Sep},
date = {2018-09-11},
organization = {13th International Meeting on
Thermodiffusion, London (UK), 11 Sep
2018 - 14 Sep 2018},
subtyp = {After Call},
cin = {ICS-3},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)ICS-3-20110106},
pnm = {551 - Functional Macromolecules and Complexes (POF3-551)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-551},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)6},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/858834},
}