% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@INBOOK{Buschbeck:858931,
      author       = {Buschbeck, Richard and Caldeira, L. and Scheins, J. and
                      Tellmann, L.},
      title        = {{CHAPTER} 12. {M}otion {C}orrection in {B}rain {MR}-{PET}},
      address      = {Cambridge},
      publisher    = {Royal Society of Chemistry},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-07767},
      series       = {New Developments in NMR},
      pages        = {259 - 272},
      year         = {2018},
      comment      = {Hybrid MR-PET Imaging / Shah, N Jon (Editor)},
      booktitle     = {Hybrid MR-PET Imaging / Shah, N Jon
                       (Editor)},
      abstract     = {Motion is a frequent problem in magnetic resonance-positron
                      emission tomography (MR-PET) acquisitions, leading to
                      significant degradations of the image quality. This chapter
                      gives an overview of this issue and potential remedies.
                      First, different ways of measuring the intra-scan motion are
                      discussed. This is sub-divided into external device-based
                      PET-based and MR-based motion detection and tracking. Given
                      that MRI-based methods can be relatively fast, they lend
                      themselves to retrospective as well as prospective
                      correction; in retrospective correction the motion
                      information is used to correct flawed k-space data after the
                      scan is completed, i.e. during reconstruction or
                      post-processing, whereas in prospective motion correction
                      the motion information is used to correct the MRI
                      measurement itself in real time while the scan is still
                      running. The goal of prospective correction is to acquire
                      data that are unaffected by any motion that occurs during
                      the measurement. Thereafter, several different motion
                      correction techniques are presented, which are able to
                      counter the negative effects of motion in both MRI and PET.},
      cin          = {INM-4 / INM-11 / JARA-BRAIN},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-11-20170113 /
                      $I:(DE-82)080010_20140620$},
      pnm          = {573 - Neuroimaging (POF3-573)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)7},
      doi          = {10.1039/9781788013062-00259},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/858931},
}