% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Risius:859215,
      author       = {Risius, Okka and Onur, Oezguer A. and Dronse, Julian and
                      von Reutern, Boris and Richter, Nils and Fink, Gereon R. and
                      Kukolja, Juraj},
      title        = {{N}eural {N}etwork {C}onnectivity {D}uring {P}ost-encoding
                      {R}est: {L}inking {E}pisodic {M}emory {E}ncoding and
                      {R}etrieval},
      journal      = {Frontiers in human neuroscience},
      volume       = {12},
      issn         = {1662-5161},
      address      = {Lausanne},
      publisher    = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-00096},
      pages        = {528},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {Commonly, a switch between networks mediating memory
                      encoding and those mediating retrieval is observed. This may
                      not only be due to differential involvement of neural
                      resources due to distinct cognitive processes but could also
                      reflect the formation of new memory traces and their dynamic
                      change during consolidation. We used resting state fMRI to
                      measure functional connectivity (FC) changes during
                      post-encoding rest, hypothesizing that during this phase,
                      new functional connections between encoding- and
                      retrieval-related regions are created. Interfering and
                      reminding tasks served as experimental modulators to
                      corroborate that the observed FC differences indeed reflect
                      changes specific to post-encoding rest. The right inferior
                      occipital and fusiform gyri (active during encoding) showed
                      increased FC with the left inferior frontal gyrus and the
                      left middle temporal gyrus (MTG) during post-encoding rest.
                      Importantly, the left MTG subsequently also mediated
                      successful retrieval. This finding might reflect the
                      formation of functional connections between encoding- and
                      retrieval-related regions during undisturbed post-encoding
                      rest. These connections were vulnerable to experimental
                      modulation: Cognitive interference disrupted FC changes
                      during post-encoding rest resulting in poorer memory
                      performance. The presentation of reminders also inhibited FC
                      increases but without affecting memory performance. Our
                      results contribute to a better understanding of the
                      mechanisms by which post-encoding rest bridges the gap
                      between encoding- and retrieval-related networks.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:30687046},
      UT           = {WOS:000455342300001},
      doi          = {10.3389/fnhum.2018.00528},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/859215},
}