% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Venghaus:859280,
      author       = {Venghaus, S. and Hake, J.-F.},
      title        = {{N}exus thinking in current {EU} policies – {T}he
                      interdependencies among food, energy and water resources},
      journal      = {Environmental science $\&$ policy},
      volume       = {90},
      issn         = {1462-9011},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-00152},
      pages        = {183 - 192},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {In recent years there has been a major, policy-driven
                      increase in research on the food-energy-water- (FEW-) nexus.
                      Although the concept has played a significant role in much
                      of the political sustainability debate since its emergence
                      in 2011, it is increasingly criticized for its conceptual
                      character and lack of practicability. To address the
                      question of the concept’s application in the political
                      practice of the European Union, an analysis of currently
                      existing EU policies has been conducted with specific focus
                      on implemented nexus thinking. To limit the scope of the
                      study, policy documents were chosen from the major political
                      frameworks within the directly nexus-relevant policy sectors
                      agricultural, energy and water policy, most notably – but
                      not exclusively – the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP),
                      the EU Energy Strategy, and the Water Framework Directive
                      (WFD), as well as documents which address the integration
                      among those. The study included a total of 50 policy
                      documents. An inductive research approach was chosen to
                      derive a FEW nexus specific coding system for the
                      computer-assisted, semi-quantitative and qualitative
                      analysis of the documents. The results reflect the fact
                      that, in the past, policy design has mostly been framed
                      within sectoral mandates, e.g., for water, agriculture or
                      energy. Cross-sectoral effects especially among all three
                      nexus resources have only recently been accounted for and
                      predominantly exist in the form of non-formalized statements
                      of intent. The establishment of cross-sectoral thinking is
                      most advanced between the sectors of agricultural and water
                      policy, mainly driven by their respective and historically
                      grown roles within the nexus system.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {320},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000450383100020},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.envsci.2017.12.014},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/859280},
}